SUCHARITA BISWAS SWARNAVA RAY vs SOURAV CHATTOPADHYAY — CO/690/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section N A. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 27-Feb-2026

CNR: WBCHCA0089382026

Filing Number

CO/692/2026

Filing Date

23-Feb-2026

Registration No

CO/690/2026

Registration Date

23-Feb-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )

Sub-Category

Divorce ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

RULE SECTION

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section N A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUCHARITA BISWAS SWARNAVA RAY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SOURAV CHATTOPADHYAY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)View PDF

    The court granted the wife/petitioner's request to transfer Matrimonial Suit No. 2360 of 2025 from Barrackpore to Alipore, South 24 Parganas, considering her hardship in traveling regularly while caring for her 5-year-old child. The court relied on Supreme Court precedent and consent of both parties, and permitted virtual appearance for the husband if requested. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Extension Of Interim Order 2

    Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)

  4. 04-May-2026

    U/S 24 Of CPC

    Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)

  5. 28-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)View PDF

  6. 06-Apr-2026

    New Motion 1

    Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)

  7. 31-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)View PDF

  8. 27-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 23-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CO/690/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted the wife/petitioner's request to transfer Matrimonial Suit No. 2360 of 2025 from Barrackpore to Alipore, South 24 Parganas, considering her hardship in traveling regularly while caring for her 5-year-old child. The court relied on Supreme Court precedent and consent of both parties, and permitted virtual appearance for the husband if requested. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case