KHOKAN BERA PRASANTA KUMAR PAKRASHI vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL — CRM(M) /548/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 23rd March 2026.

CNR: WBCHCA0087822026

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

26th February 2026

Filing Number

CRM(M) /509/2026

Filing Date

20-02-2026

Registration No

CRM(M) /548/2026

Registration Date

23-02-2026

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE KAUSIK CHANDA

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE KAUSIK CHANDA

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )

Sub-Category

Bail/Cancellation of bail ( 11 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL SECTION

Decision Date

23rd March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 483
Code of Criminal Procedure ,1973 Section 439
Indian Penal Code Act ,1860 Section 147/148/149/186/332/35/307/506/333/353

Petitioner(s)

KHOKAN BERA PRASANTA KUMAR PAKRASHI

Respondent(s)

STATE OF WEST BENGAL

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE KAUSIK CHANDA

26-02-2026

APPLICATION FOR BAIL

20-03-2026

APPLICATION FOR BAIL

19-03-2026

APPLICATION FOR BAIL

18-03-2026

APPLICATION FOR BAIL

17-03-2026

APPLICATION FOR BAIL

Orders

23-03-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE KAUSIK CHANDA

Summary: The court granted bail to Khokan Bera in CRM(M) 548/2026, allowing his release upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount. The court accepted the petitioner's explanation of miscommunication with counsel for his prolonged absconding period, and considered that he had previously been granted bail in the same case. The bail is conditional on his regular court appearance and non-tampering with witnesses or evidence, with provisions for bail cancellation upon non-compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court granted bail to Khokan Bera in CRM(M) 548/2026, allowing his release upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount. The court accepted the petitioner's explanation of miscommunication with counsel for his prolonged absconding period, and considered that he had previously been granted bail in the same case. The bail is conditional on his regular court appearance and non-tampering with witnesses or evidence, with provisions for bail cancellation upon non-compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case