PROKASH MALLICK PAMPA DEY (DHABAL) vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA /4299/2026

Case under West Bengal Secondary Education Act ,1963 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 25th March 2026.

CNR: WBCHCA0081782026

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

25th February 2026

Filing Number

WPA /4082/2026

Filing Date

18-02-2026

Registration No

WPA /4299/2026

Registration Date

19-02-2026

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE REETOBROTO KUMAR MITRA

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE REETOBROTO KUMAR MITRA

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

In service Transfer 113 ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Decision Date

25th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Acts & Sections

West Bengal Secondary Education Act ,1963 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

PROKASH MALLICK PAMPA DEY (DHABAL)

Respondent(s)

STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE REETOBROTO KUMAR MITRA

25-02-2026

NEW MOTION

25-03-2026

TRANSFER MATTER-1

24-03-2026

TRANSFER MATTER-1

27-02-2026

TRANSFER MATTERS

26-02-2026

TRANSFER MATTERS

Orders

25-03-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE REETOBROTO KUMAR MITRA

Case Summary The Calcutta High Court disposed of teacher Prokash Mallick's transfer petition by directing the District Inspector of Schools to process his pending 2022 transfer application within 30 days without withholding recommendation based on him being the single subject teacher—a ground already rejected in prior court precedents. The court also clarified that portal suspension would not prevent offline consideration of his transfer application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Calcutta High Court disposed of teacher Prokash Mallick's transfer petition by directing the District Inspector of Schools to process his pending 2022 transfer application within 30 days without withholding recommendation based on him being the single subject teacher—a ground already rejected in prior court precedents. The court also clarified that portal suspension would not prevent offline consideration of his transfer application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case