LALBANU RAJBHAR OINDRILA SINHA vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA /4141/2026

Case under West Bengal Panchayat (gram Panchayat Administration) Rule ,2004 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 23rd March 2026.

CNR: WBCHCA0079942026

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

09th March 2026

Filing Number

WPA /3978/2026

Filing Date

17-02-2026

Registration No

WPA /4141/2026

Registration Date

18-02-2026

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE SUVRA GHOSH

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE SUVRA GHOSH

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

BUILDING PLAN ( 6 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Decision Date

23rd March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Acts & Sections

West Bengal Panchayat (Gram Panchayat Administration) Rule ,2004 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

LALBANU RAJBHAR OINDRILA SINHA

Respondent(s)

STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE SUVRA GHOSH

09-03-2026

NEW MOTION

23-03-2026

NEW MOTION

20-03-2026

NEW MOTION

18-03-2026

NEW MOTION

16-03-2026

NEW MOTION

Orders

23-03-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE SUVRA GHOSH

The West Bengal High Court directed the Pradhan of Amrasota Gram Panchayat to consider and dispose of the petitioner's construction sanction application (submitted October 30, 2025) within four weeks with reasonable hearing opportunity, and communicate the decision within one week thereafter. The writ petition was disposed of without costs, and allegations in the petition were deemed not admitted as no counter-affidavit was invited. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The West Bengal High Court directed the Pradhan of Amrasota Gram Panchayat to consider and dispose of the petitioner's construction sanction application (submitted October 30, 2025) within four weeks with reasonable hearing opportunity, and communicate the decision within one week thereafter. The writ petition was disposed of without costs, and allegations in the petition were deemed not admitted as no counter-affidavit was invited. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case