M/S BEGUMPUR INDANE GRAMIN VITRAK AND ORS. RAMESH DHARA vs INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED AND ORS. — WPA/4012/2026
Case under Essential Commodities Act Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 11th May 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0079182026
Next Hearing
23rd February 2026
Filing Number
WPA/3949/2026
Filing Date
17-02-2026
Registration No
WPA/4012/2026
Registration Date
17-02-2026
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE SMITA DAS DE
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE SMITA DAS DE
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
Miscellaneous ( 8 )
Judicial Branch
MANDAMUS SECTION
Decision Date
11th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M/S BEGUMPUR INDANE GRAMIN VITRAK AND ORS. RAMESH DHARA
Respondent(s)
INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED AND ORS.
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE SMITA DAS DE
NEW MOTION
MOTION (GROUP - VIII)
MOTION (GROUP - VIII)
MOTION (GROUP - VIII)
MOTION (GROUP - VIII)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-02-2026 | NEW MOTION |
| 23-03-2026 | MOTION (GROUP - VIII) |
| 18-03-2026 | MOTION (GROUP - VIII) |
| 16-03-2026 | MOTION (GROUP - VIII) |
| 11-03-2026 | MOTION (GROUP - VIII) |
Orders
The court dismissed the writ petition challenging Indian Oil Corporation Limited's revocation of approval for reconstituting an LPG distributorship from sole proprietorship to partnership. The court held that execution of the formal distributorship agreement is a mandatory condition precedent under IOCL's guidelines, and the petitioners' failure to execute it within the stipulated timeline despite multiple reminders justified IOCL's revocation decision, which was a well-reasoned administrative order not suffering from any infirmity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court dismissed the writ petition challenging Indian Oil Corporation Limited's revocation of approval for reconstituting an LPG distributorship from sole proprietorship to partnership. The court held that execution of the formal distributorship agreement is a mandatory condition precedent under IOCL's guidelines, and the petitioners' failure to execute it within the stipulated timeline despite multiple reminders justified IOCL's revocation decision, which was a well-reasoned administrative order not suffering from any infirmity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts