BAHAR SK. SANJIB SETH vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA/4042/2026
Case under West Bengal Panchayat Act ,1973 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 23rd March 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0078322026
Filing Number
WPA/3896/2026
Filing Date
17-Feb-2026
Registration No
WPA/4042/2026
Registration Date
18-Feb-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Suvra Ghosh
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Suvra Ghosh
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
BUILDING PLAN ( 6 )
Judicial Branch
MANDAMUS SECTION
Decision Date
23-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 27-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BAHAR SK. SANJIB SETH
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Justice Suvra GhoshView PDF
Summary: The West Bengal High Court dismissed Bahar Sk.'s writ petition challenging alleged illegal construction on a plot. The petitioner claimed to be a co-owner but deliberately suppressed that his partition suit asserting co-ownership had been dismissed by the Civil Judge on December 17, 2025. The court held that the petitioner failed to approach the court with "clean hands" by concealing this material fact and therefore was not entitled to any relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Mar-2026
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Suvra Ghosh
-
20-Mar-2026
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Suvra Ghosh
-
18-Mar-2026
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Suvra Ghosh
-
11-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Justice Suvra GhoshView PDF
-
11-Mar-2026
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Suvra Ghosh
-
09-Mar-2026
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Suvra Ghosh
-
06-Mar-2026
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Suvra Ghosh
-
05-Mar-2026
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Suvra Ghosh
-
02-Mar-2026
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Suvra Ghosh
-
27-Feb-2026
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Kausik Chanda
-
26-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPA/4042/2026
Summary: The West Bengal High Court dismissed Bahar Sk.'s writ petition challenging alleged illegal construction on a plot. The petitioner claimed to be a co-owner but deliberately suppressed that his partition suit asserting co-ownership had been dismissed by the Civil Judge on December 17, 2025. The court held that the petitioner failed to approach the court with "clean hands" by concealing this material fact and therefore was not entitled to any relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts