SAMIUL ALIM AND ORS GOLAM MOHIUDDIN vs SHASHANK SETHI, DISTRICT MAGISTRATE — CPAN/203/2026

Case under No Act Section NA. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: WBCHCA0075682026

Filing Number

CPAN/208/2026

Filing Date

16-Feb-2026

Registration No

CPAN/203/2026

Registration Date

16-Feb-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Chief Justice Sujoy Paul , Hon'ble Justice Smita Das De

Coram

Hon'ble Chief Justice Sujoy Paul , Hon'ble Justice Smita Das De

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )

Sub-Category

Civil Contempt ( 8 )

Judicial Branch

FIRST MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL (FMA) SECTION

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

No Act Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAMIUL ALIM AND ORS GOLAM MOHIUDDIN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHASHANK SETHI, DISTRICT MAGISTRATE

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Chief Justice Sujoy Paul,hon'ble Justice Smita Das DeView PDF

    Case Summary: CPAN 203/2026 In this contempt petition against the District Magistrate, North 24-Parganas, the court permitted the substitution of the respondent officer due to a change in incumbency during the petition's pendency. The applicants were directed to serve the petition and annexures on the newly substituted respondent and file an affidavit of service. The matter was adjourned for hearing after the Summer Vacation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Contempt Application

    Hon'ble Chief Justice Sujoy Paul , Hon'ble Justice Smita Das De

  4. 27-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Chief Justice Sujoy Paul,hon'ble Justice Smita Das DeView PDF

  5. 20-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 16-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CPAN/203/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CPAN 203/2026 In this contempt petition against the District Magistrate, North 24-Parganas, the court permitted the substitution of the respondent officer due to a change in incumbency during the petition's pendency. The applicants were directed to serve the petition and annexures on the newly substituted respondent and file an affidavit of service. The matter was adjourned for hearing after the Summer Vacation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case