MALLIKA NASKAR SUBHOSREE BANERJEE vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — FMA/937/2025
Case under West Bengal Secondary Education Act ,1963 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 14th August 2025.
CNR: WBCHCA0074402025
Next Hearing
19th February 2025
Filing Number
MAT/230/2025
Filing Date
14-02-2025
Registration No
FMA/937/2025
Registration Date
15-02-2025
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE TAPABRATA CHAKRABORTY , HON'BLE JUSTICE REETOBROTO KUMAR MITRA
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE TAPABRATA CHAKRABORTY , HON'BLE JUSTICE REETOBROTO KUMAR MITRA
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
SECONDARY EDUCATION ( 8 )
Judicial Branch
FIRST MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL (FMA) SECTION
Decision Date
14th August 2025
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MALLIKA NASKAR SUBHOSREE BANERJEE
Respondent(s)
STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE TAPABRATA CHAKRABORTY , HON'BLE JUSTICE REETOBROTO KUMAR MITRA
FOR ADMISSION
CONTEMPT APPLICATION
CONTEMPT APPLICATION
CONTEMPT APPLICATION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 19-02-2025 | FOR ADMISSION |
| 07-05-2026 | CONTEMPT APPLICATION |
| 06-05-2026 | CONTEMPT APPLICATION |
| 27-03-2026 | CONTEMPT APPLICATION |
Orders
Summary: In a contempt of court application, Mallika Naskar alleged violation of a January 22, 2025 court order regarding her transfer. While the Commissioner of School Education accepted a local arrangement proposal in December 2025, the court found prima facie that the second contemnor failed to take appropriate compliance steps. The court adjourned the matter to June 25, 2026, warning of potential personal appearance directions if compliance is not achieved, and directed the petitioner to serve the order within one week. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In a contempt of court application, Mallika Naskar alleged violation of a January 22, 2025 court order regarding her transfer. While the Commissioner of School Education accepted a local arrangement proposal in December 2025, the court found prima facie that the second contemnor failed to take appropriate compliance steps. The court adjourned the matter to June 25, 2026, warning of potential personal appearance directions if compliance is not achieved, and directed the petitioner to serve the order within one week. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts