SANTANA SARDAR ALIAS SANTANA SARDAR MUNDA ALIAS SANTANA MUNDA SABITA KHUTIA BHUNYA vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. — WPA/3816/2026
Case under No Act Section NA. Next hearing: 07th April 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0073432026
Filing Number
WPA/3601/2026
Filing Date
13-Feb-2026
Registration No
WPA/3816/2026
Registration Date
16-Feb-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Amrita Sinha
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Amrita Sinha
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
Miscellaneous ( 16 )
Judicial Branch
MANDAMUS SECTION
Last updated 27-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SANTANA SARDAR ALIAS SANTANA SARDAR MUNDA ALIAS SANTANA MUNDA SABITA KHUTIA BHUNYA
Respondent(s)
-
1.UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
-
2.THE PRINCIPAL CONTROLLER OF DEFENCE ACCOUNTS (PENSIONS)
-
3.THE COMMANDING OFFICER,
-
4.THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER, SBI
-
5.THE MAJOR/LIEUTENANT COLONEL CO.
-
6.THE RECORD OFFICER, BOMBAY ENGG GROUP AND CENTRE
Case History
-
07-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
07-Apr-2026
Motion
Hon'ble Justice Amrita Sinha
-
23-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Justice Amrita SinhaView PDF
Summary: The case was adjourned to April 7, 2026. The High Court at Calcutta directed the Union of India's counsel to clarify whether the writ petition is maintainable before the High Court as the first instance, considering the petitioner's husband was serving in the Army. The affidavit of service was taken on record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Mar-2026
Motion
Hon'ble Justice Amrita Sinha
-
02-Mar-2026
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Amrita Sinha
-
02-Mar-2026
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Saugata Bhattacharyya
-
01-Mar-2026
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Saugata Bhattacharyya
-
27-Feb-2026
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Saugata Bhattacharyya
-
26-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPA/3816/2026
Summary: The case was adjourned to April 7, 2026. The High Court at Calcutta directed the Union of India's counsel to clarify whether the writ petition is maintainable before the High Court as the first instance, considering the petitioner's husband was serving in the Army. The affidavit of service was taken on record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts