TANUSHRI MONDAL AND ORS. SHAMIM UL BARI vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — MAT/268/2026

Case under No Act Section NA. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 18-Feb-2026

CNR: WBCHCA0071042026

Filing Number

MAT/273/2026

Filing Date

13-Feb-2026

Registration No

MAT/268/2026

Registration Date

13-Feb-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya , Hon'ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya , Hon'ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

In service Other 177 ( 8 )

Judicial Branch

STAMP REPORTER (SR) SECTION

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED

Last updated 27-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

No Act Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.TANUSHRI MONDAL AND ORS. SHAMIM UL BARI

  2. 2.ABHISHEK KUMAR SINGH

  3. 3.SOUVIK BHATTACHARYYA

  4. 4.URMILA MONDAL

  5. 5.KASHISH KUMARI

  6. 6.ANKITA GANGULY

  7. 7.SAYAN ADHYA

  8. 8.DAROTHI SAMADDER

  9. 9.ASHISH KUMAR

  10. 10.JAYANT ADDI

  11. 11.POULAMI DEY

  12. 12.ARITRAJIT GUHA

  13. 13.NABIN GORAIN

  14. 14.ANANDI DEBNATH

  15. 15.RIMI SARKAR

  16. 16.JOY GOPGARAI

  17. 17.SOUGATA BASU

  18. 18.ABHISHEK GHOSH

  19. 19.NEHA MONDAL

  20. 20.JHUMA MONDAL

  21. 21.DEEPANSHU

  22. 22.ANUJ KUMAR

  23. 23.MD. WAKKAR ALAM

  24. 24.CHANDRADEEP GUPTA

  25. 25.CHANDAN GHOSAL

  26. 26.SHRUTI RANI

  27. 27.ANTIMA KUMARI

  28. 28.SWARNAVA ROY

  29. 29.SHREETY CHAND

  30. 30.SANSKAR KUMAR

  31. 31.SRIJITA KAR

  32. 32.ANUBHAB CHATTERJEE

  33. 33.ANUSHKA GHOSH

  34. 34.ARCHISMITA DAS

  35. 35.PUJA KUMARI

  36. 36.SAKSHI ROY

  37. 37.RONIT PAUL

  38. 38.SANTU GHOSH

  39. 39.ANUNAY VERMA

  40. 40.MAYANK TRIVEDI

  41. 41.AVIJIT BHUSHAN

  42. 42.RAJAN RAJ

  43. 43.SHUBHAM KUMAR PANDEY

  44. 44.KOYEL PANDA

  45. 45.SIDDHARTHA GHORUI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

  2. 2.THE DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION

  3. 3.THE SECY. , TECHNICAL EDUCATION, GOVT. OF W.B.

  4. 4.THE DEPUTY SECY. DEPT. OF HIGHER EDUCATION

  5. 5.ALL INDIA COUNCIL OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION

  6. 6.THE CHAIRMAN, ALL INDIA COUNCIL OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION

  7. 7.MAULANA ABUL KALAM AZAD UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY

  8. 8.THE VICE CHANCELLOR, MAKAUT

  9. 9.THE REGISTRAR, MAKAUT

  10. 10.DR. B.C.ROY ENGG. COLLEGE

  11. 11.THE PRINCIPAL, DR. B.C. ROY ENGG.

  12. 12.THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS

  13. 13.ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSIONAL ACEDEMIC INSTITUTE

  14. 14.THE PRESIDENT, ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSIONAL ACADEMIC INSTITUTE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya,hon'ble Justice Supratim BhattacharyaView PDF

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya,hon'ble Justice Supratim BhattacharyaView PDF

    Summary The High Court of Calcutta allowed three appeals by engineering students challenging a mid-session fee hike notification dated October 16, 2023. The court held that while the fee enhancement itself complied with regulations, it could not apply retroactively to students who had already completed their admission process before the notification date. The court ordered the revised fee structure to apply only prospectively to students admitted on or after October 16, 2023, and directed refund or adjustment of additional fees already collected from previously-admitted students. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya,hon'ble Justice Supratim BhattacharyaView PDF

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya,hon'ble Justice Supratim BhattacharyaView PDF

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    Assigned Matters

    Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya , Hon'ble Justice Partha Sarathi Chatterjee

  7. 11-Mar-2026

    Assigned Matters

    Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya , Hon'ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya

  8. 10-Mar-2026

    Assigned Matters

    Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya , Hon'ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya

  9. 25-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Tapabrata Chakraborty,hon'ble Justice Partha Sarathi ChatterjeeView PDF

  10. 25-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Tapabrata Chakraborty,hon'ble Justice Partha Sarathi ChatterjeeView PDF

  11. 25-Feb-2026

    To Be Mentioned

    Hon'ble Justice Tapabrata Chakraborty , Hon'ble Justice Partha Sarathi Chatterjee

  12. 18-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  13. 13-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MAT/268/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The High Court of Calcutta allowed three appeals by engineering students challenging a mid-session fee hike notification dated October 16, 2023. The court held that while the fee enhancement itself complied with regulations, it could not apply retroactively to students who had already completed their admission process before the notification date. The court ordered the revised fee structure to apply only prospectively to students admitted on or after October 16, 2023, and directed refund or adjustment of additional fees already collected from previously-admitted students. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case