TANUSHRI MONDAL AND ORS. SHAMIM UL BARI vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — MAT /268/2026
Case under No Act Section NA. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 23rd March 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0071042026
Next Hearing
18th February 2026
Filing Number
MAT /273/2026
Filing Date
13-02-2026
Registration No
MAT /268/2026
Registration Date
13-02-2026
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE SABYASACHI BHATTACHARYYA , HON'BLE JUSTICE SUPRATIM BHATTACHARYA
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE SABYASACHI BHATTACHARYYA , HON'BLE JUSTICE SUPRATIM BHATTACHARYA
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
In service Other 177 ( 8 )
Judicial Branch
STAMP REPORTER (SR) SECTION
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
TANUSHRI MONDAL AND ORS. SHAMIM UL BARI
ABHISHEK KUMAR SINGH
SOUVIK BHATTACHARYYA
URMILA MONDAL
KASHISH KUMARI
ANKITA GANGULY
SAYAN ADHYA
DAROTHI SAMADDER
ASHISH KUMAR
JAYANT ADDI
POULAMI DEY
ARITRAJIT GUHA
NABIN GORAIN
ANANDI DEBNATH
RIMI SARKAR
JOY GOPGARAI
SOUGATA BASU
ABHISHEK GHOSH
NEHA MONDAL
JHUMA MONDAL
DEEPANSHU
ANUJ KUMAR
MD. WAKKAR ALAM
CHANDRADEEP GUPTA
CHANDAN GHOSAL
SHRUTI RANI
ANTIMA KUMARI
SWARNAVA ROY
SHREETY CHAND
SANSKAR KUMAR
SRIJITA KAR
ANUBHAB CHATTERJEE
ANUSHKA GHOSH
ARCHISMITA DAS
PUJA KUMARI
SAKSHI ROY
RONIT PAUL
SANTU GHOSH
ANUNAY VERMA
MAYANK TRIVEDI
AVIJIT BHUSHAN
RAJAN RAJ
SHUBHAM KUMAR PANDEY
KOYEL PANDA
SIDDHARTHA GHORUI
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
THE DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION
THE SECY. , TECHNICAL EDUCATION, GOVT. OF W.B.
THE DEPUTY SECY. DEPT. OF HIGHER EDUCATION
ALL INDIA COUNCIL OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION
THE CHAIRMAN, ALL INDIA COUNCIL OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION
MAULANA ABUL KALAM AZAD UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
THE VICE CHANCELLOR, MAKAUT
THE REGISTRAR, MAKAUT
DR. B.C.ROY ENGG. COLLEGE
THE PRINCIPAL, DR. B.C. ROY ENGG.
THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS
ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSIONAL ACEDEMIC INSTITUTE
THE PRESIDENT, ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSIONAL ACADEMIC INSTITUTE
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE SABYASACHI BHATTACHARYYA , HON'BLE JUSTICE SUPRATIM BHATTACHARYA
FOR ADMISSION
ASSIGNED MATTERS
ASSIGNED MATTERS
ASSIGNED MATTERS
TO BE MENTIONED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 18-02-2026 | FOR ADMISSION | |
| 11-03-2026 | ASSIGNED MATTERS | |
| 11-03-2026 | ASSIGNED MATTERS | |
| 10-03-2026 | ASSIGNED MATTERS | |
| 25-02-2026 | TO BE MENTIONED |
Orders
Summary The High Court of Calcutta allowed three appeals by engineering students challenging a mid-session fee hike notification dated October 16, 2023. The court held that while the fee enhancement itself complied with regulations, it could not apply retroactively to students who had already completed their admission process before the notification date. The court ordered the revised fee structure to apply only prospectively to students admitted on or after October 16, 2023, and directed refund or adjustment of additional fees already collected from previously-admitted students. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The High Court of Calcutta allowed three appeals by engineering students challenging a mid-session fee hike notification dated October 16, 2023. The court held that while the fee enhancement itself complied with regulations, it could not apply retroactively to students who had already completed their admission process before the notification date. The court ordered the revised fee structure to apply only prospectively to students admitted on or after October 16, 2023, and directed refund or adjustment of additional fees already collected from previously-admitted students. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts