DEBAJYOTI DEY AND ORS. SHAMIM UL BARI vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — FMA /288/2026

Case under No Act Section NA. Disposed: --PARTLY ALLOWED on 23rd March 2026.

CNR: WBCHCA0070992026

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

18th February 2026

Filing Number

MAT /271/2026

Filing Date

13-02-2026

Registration No

FMA /288/2026

Registration Date

13-02-2026

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE SABYASACHI BHATTACHARYYA , HON'BLE JUSTICE SUPRATIM BHATTACHARYA

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE SABYASACHI BHATTACHARYYA , HON'BLE JUSTICE SUPRATIM BHATTACHARYA

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

In service Other 177 ( 8 )

Judicial Branch

FIRST MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL (FMA) SECTION

Decision Date

23rd March 2026

Nature of Disposal

--PARTLY ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

NO ACT Section NA

Petitioner(s)

DEBAJYOTI DEY AND ORS. SHAMIM UL BARI

ABHIK DEY

SANTANU PAL

PRITAM KUMAR DAS

NILANJAN MONDAL

SAYANTAN BHADRA

SNEHA SATPATHI

SHOVAN ROY

SUBHAJIT MONDAL

RAHUL MONDAL

AYON PAUL

SAYANTAN MODAK

SOURIK CHATTERJEE

SUJOYA GHOSH

ASHMIT SARKAR

MARMA BISWAS

JANMEJOY CHAKRABORTY

SUDIP SHOW

RITAM MONDAL

ABHIK DEY

SUPREME DEY

ANANYA CHAKRABORTY

ANIKET BANERJEE

ARPITA KUMAR

ARNAB GHOSH

MANABENDU DAS

ANISH DEBNATH

SUBHADEEP GORAI

MD. EHSAN ANSARI

DEBRAJ PAL

SREYAN SARKAR

BISWAJIT DEY

SANKU GHOSH

SOUVIK SAHA

SUBHIK MONDAL

DITSA GHOSH

TANISHA DAS

REZWANA KHAN CHOWDHURY

ANIKA RAHMAN

SOVAN BANERJEE

RIKTA MAJI

NIKITA TANTI

AYAN MAZUMDAR

NABANITA KUNDU

SOUMYANIL ROY

DEBJEET DAS

PABITRA DARIPA

PRITAM GHOSH

PURBA BANERJEE

INDRAJIT PATHAK

NILANJAN MANDAL

MD. HASNAIN

AMAR MAHATO

SUBHAJIT CHOWDHURY

ANURAG SINGH

ABIR CHAKRABORTY

TUHIN CHAKRABORTY

SURAJIT JANA

RAHUL PODDAR

BIJOY KUMAR ADITYA

SWETAB BARANWAL

JYOTIRMOY GHOSH

SANKHA SUBHRA SINGHAMAHAPATRA

KAIF ALI KHAN

MEGHA KHAN

DEBASIS MAHATA

KRISHAN SARKAR

ABHISHEK KUMAR

ARPIT MISHRA

KAUSHANI KONER

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

THE DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION

THE SECRETARY (TECHNICAL EDUCATION)

THE DEPUTY SECY., DEPT. OF HIGHER EDUATION (T.E.)

ALL INDIA COUNCIL OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION

THE CHAIRMAN, ALL INDIA COUNCIL OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION

MAULANA ABUL KALAM AZAD UNIVERSITY OF TECHNILOGY

THE VICE CHANCELLOR, MAKAUT

THE REGISTRAR, MAKAUT

DR. B.C. ROY ENGG. COLLEGE

THE PRINCIPAL, DR. B.C. ROY ENGG. COLLEGE

THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS, DR. B.C. ROY ENGG. COLLEGE

ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSIONAL ACADEMIC INSTITUTES

THE PRESIDENT, ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSIONAL ACADEMIC INSTITUTION

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE SABYASACHI BHATTACHARYYA , HON'BLE JUSTICE SUPRATIM BHATTACHARYA

18-02-2026

FOR ADMISSION

11-03-2026

ASSIGNED MATTERS

11-03-2026

ASSIGNED MATTERS

10-03-2026

ASSIGNED MATTERS

Orders

23-03-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE SABYASACHI BHATTACHARYYA,HON'BLE JUSTICE SUPRATIM BHATTACHARYA

Summary The Calcutta High Court allowed three consolidated appeals by engineering and pharmacy students challenging a mid-session fee hike (October 16, 2023) by Dr. B.C. Roy Engineering College. The court read down the fee increase notification to apply only prospectively to students admitted after October 16, 2023, not to those who had already completed admission before that date. The college was directed to refund additional amounts collected from already-admitted students or adjust them against future semester fees, protecting students' substantive rights and financial reliance on the original fee structure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Calcutta High Court allowed three consolidated appeals by engineering and pharmacy students challenging a mid-session fee hike (October 16, 2023) by Dr. B.C. Roy Engineering College. The court read down the fee increase notification to apply only prospectively to students admitted after October 16, 2023, not to those who had already completed admission before that date. The college was directed to refund additional amounts collected from already-admitted students or adjust them against future semester fees, protecting students' substantive rights and financial reliance on the original fee structure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case