DIPA PAUL TUHIN BISWAS vs RUPA ROY AND ANR. — CO/549/2026
Case under Partition Act ,1893 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 04th May 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0070412026
Next Hearing
23rd February 2026
Filing Number
CO/551/2026
Filing Date
13-02-2026
Registration No
CO/549/2026
Registration Date
13-02-2026
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE OM NARAYAN RAI
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE OM NARAYAN RAI
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )
Sub-Category
Partition ( 39 )
Judicial Branch
RULE SECTION
Decision Date
04th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
DIPA PAUL TUHIN BISWAS
Respondent(s)
RUPA ROY AND ANR.
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE OM NARAYAN RAI
NEW MOTION
EXPEDITIOUS DISPOSAL MATTERS
EXPEDITIOUS DISPOSAL MATTERS
EXPEDITIOUS DISPOSAL MATTERS
EXPEDITIOUS DISPOSAL MATTERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-02-2026 | NEW MOTION |
| 04-05-2026 | EXPEDITIOUS DISPOSAL MATTERS |
| 30-03-2026 | EXPEDITIOUS DISPOSAL MATTERS |
| 27-03-2026 | EXPEDITIOUS DISPOSAL MATTERS |
| 06-04-2026 | EXPEDITIOUS DISPOSAL MATTERS |
Orders
The court disposed of the revisional application seeking expeditious disposal of Title Suit No. 377 of 2008, which has been pending due to a Partition Commissioner's failure to file a report since January 2016 despite receiving fees. The court directed the trial court to compel the Partition Commissioner to file the report expeditiously and dispose of the suit within six months, while allowing parties to seek the Commissioner's removal and potential refund of fees if further delays occur. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court disposed of the revisional application seeking expeditious disposal of Title Suit No. 377 of 2008, which has been pending due to a Partition Commissioner's failure to file a report since January 2016 despite receiving fees. The court directed the trial court to compel the Partition Commissioner to file the report expeditiously and dispose of the suit within six months, while allowing parties to seek the Commissioner's removal and potential refund of fees if further delays occur. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts