PRADIP BAYEN DEBABRATA SARDAR vs THE KOLKATA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS. — WPA(P)/63/2025
Case under Kolkata Municipal Corporation Act ,1980 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 27th March 2025.
CNR: WBCHCA0068902025
Filing Number
WPA(P)/54/2025
Filing Date
12-Feb-2025
Registration No
WPA(P)/63/2025
Registration Date
18-Feb-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Chief Justice Sujoy Paul , Hon'ble Justice Chaitali Chatterjee (Das)
Coram
Hon'ble Chief Justice Sujoy Paul , Hon'ble Justice Chaitali Chatterjee (Das)
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
Public Interest Litigation ( 21 )
Judicial Branch
MANDAMUS SECTION
Decision Date
27-Mar-2025
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PRADIP BAYEN DEBABRATA SARDAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE KOLKATA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Chief Justice Sujoy Paul,hon'ble Justice Chaitali Chatterjee (Das)View PDF
This is an interim order in WPA(P)/63/2025. The court accepted the KMC's report filed by counsel and directed that a copy be supplied to the petitioner's counsel. The court granted three weeks for the petitioner to file a response and listed the matter for further hearing thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Mar-2025
The Hon'ble The Chief Justice T.S Sivagnanam,hon'ble Justice Chaitali Chatterjee (Das)View PDF
-
27-Mar-2025
Motion 1
The Hon'ble The Chief Justice T.S Sivagnanam , Hon'ble Justice Chaitali Chatterjee (Das)
-
20-Mar-2025
Pil
The Hon'ble The Chief Justice T.S Sivagnanam , Hon'ble Justice Chaitali Chatterjee (Das)
-
13-Mar-2025
Pil
The Hon'ble The Chief Justice T.S Sivagnanam , Hon'ble Justice Chaitali Chatterjee (Das)
-
06-Mar-2025
Motion 2
The Hon'ble The Chief Justice T.S Sivagnanam , Hon'ble Justice Chaitali Chatterjee (Das)
-
27-Feb-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Feb-2025
Case filed
Registration No. WPA(P)/63/2025
This is an interim order in WPA(P)/63/2025. The court accepted the KMC's report filed by counsel and directed that a copy be supplied to the petitioner's counsel. The court granted three weeks for the petitioner to file a response and listed the matter for further hearing thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts