ARIF MANDAL RITIKA YADAV vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA/3614/2026
Case under Administrative Tribunals Act Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 23rd March 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0068052026
Filing Number
WPA/3351/2026
Filing Date
11-Feb-2026
Registration No
WPA/3614/2026
Registration Date
13-Feb-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Amrita Sinha
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Amrita Sinha
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
Miscellaneous ( 16 )
Judicial Branch
MANDAMUS SECTION
Decision Date
23-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 27-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ARIF MANDAL RITIKA YADAV
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Justice Amrita SinhaView PDF
The High Court at Calcutta dismissed the writ petition filed by Arif Mandal challenging the respondents' inaction in disclosing his recruitment test marks. The court found that Mandal secured 78.33 marks in the written test and 60 in the interview, both falling below the OBC, PH (B/LV) category cutoff of 63.67, rendering him ineligible for appointment. The court declined to exercise jurisdiction and upheld the selection process's validity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Mar-2026
Motion
Hon'ble Justice Amrita Sinha
-
02-Mar-2026
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Amrita Sinha
-
02-Mar-2026
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Saugata Bhattacharyya
-
01-Mar-2026
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Saugata Bhattacharyya
-
27-Feb-2026
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Saugata Bhattacharyya
-
26-Feb-2026
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Saugata Bhattacharyya
-
25-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPA/3614/2026
The High Court at Calcutta dismissed the writ petition filed by Arif Mandal challenging the respondents' inaction in disclosing his recruitment test marks. The court found that Mandal secured 78.33 marks in the written test and 60 in the interview, both falling below the OBC, PH (B/LV) category cutoff of 63.67, rendering him ineligible for appointment. The court declined to exercise jurisdiction and upheld the selection process's validity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts