CHIRA RANJAN BISWAS SURAJIT ROY vs MONOJ KUMAR GOGOI, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, FCI AND ORS. — CPAN/173/2026

Case under Contempt of Courts Act Section NA. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: WBCHCA0065542026

Filing Number

CPAN/179/2026

Filing Date

11-Feb-2026

Registration No

CPAN/173/2026

Registration Date

11-Feb-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Chief Justice Sujoy Paul , Hon'ble Justice Smita Das De

Coram

Hon'ble Chief Justice Sujoy Paul , Hon'ble Justice Smita Das De

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )

Sub-Category

Civil Contempt ( 8 )

Judicial Branch

FIRST MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL (FMA) SECTION

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Contempt of Courts Act Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHIRA RANJAN BISWAS SURAJIT ROY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MONOJ KUMAR GOGOI, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, FCI AND ORS.

  2. 2.AMARESH KUMAR, GENERAL MANAGER, FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA

  3. 3.JAGADISH PULI, MANAGER (ACCOUNTS) FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Chief Justice Sujoy Paul,hon'ble Justice Smita Das DeView PDF

    Case Summary: CPAN 173/2026 The petitioner alleged non-compliance with the court's September 2025 directions regarding issuance of a Pension Payment Order (P.P.O.) and release of provisional pension from FCI. The respondents claimed a P.P.O. had been issued with pension deposited in the pensioner's account. The court adjourned the matter to the first week of July 2026, directing the petitioner's counsel to verify the respondent's claim and reserving the right to take contempt action if the statement proves incorrect. The petitioner may also file a separate application challenging the pension calculation in the pending appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Chief Justice Sujoy Paul,hon'ble Justice Smita Das DeView PDF

  4. 16-Feb-2026

    Contempt

    Hon'ble Chief Justice Sujoy Paul , Hon'ble Justice Smita Das De

  5. 11-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CPAN/173/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CPAN 173/2026 The petitioner alleged non-compliance with the court's September 2025 directions regarding issuance of a Pension Payment Order (P.P.O.) and release of provisional pension from FCI. The respondents claimed a P.P.O. had been issued with pension deposited in the pensioner's account. The court adjourned the matter to the first week of July 2026, directing the petitioner's counsel to verify the respondent's claim and reserving the right to take contempt action if the statement proves incorrect. The petitioner may also file a separate application challenging the pension calculation in the pending appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case