SWAPAN KUMAR NAYEK SOUMYA RAHA vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL — CRM(M) /419/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 17th March 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0062882026
Next Hearing
13th February 2026
Filing Number
CRM(M) /378/2026
Filing Date
09-02-2026
Registration No
CRM(M) /419/2026
Registration Date
10-02-2026
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE KAUSIK CHANDA
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE KAUSIK CHANDA
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )
Sub-Category
Bail/Cancellation of bail ( 11 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL SECTION
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SWAPAN KUMAR NAYEK SOUMYA RAHA
Respondent(s)
STATE OF WEST BENGAL
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE KAUSIK CHANDA
APPLICATION FOR BAIL
APPLICATION FOR BAIL
APPLICATION FOR BAIL
APPLICATION FOR BAIL
APPLICATION FOR BAIL
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 13-02-2026 | APPLICATION FOR BAIL | |
| 17-03-2026 | APPLICATION FOR BAIL | |
| 16-03-2026 | APPLICATION FOR BAIL | |
| 13-03-2026 | APPLICATION FOR BAIL | |
| 12-03-2026 | APPLICATION FOR BAIL |
Orders
The court partially relaxed bail conditions imposed on Swapan Kumar Nayek, the Municipality Chairman accused of criminal breach of trust and forgery, allowing him to attend his office 12:00-2:00 p.m. three days weekly with 24 hours' prior notice. The court balanced the municipality's operational needs against ongoing investigation concerns by permitting limited office access under supervision to prevent evidence tampering or witness interference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court partially relaxed bail conditions imposed on Swapan Kumar Nayek, the Municipality Chairman accused of criminal breach of trust and forgery, allowing him to attend his office 12:00-2:00 p.m. three days weekly with 24 hours' prior notice. The court balanced the municipality's operational needs against ongoing investigation concerns by permitting limited office access under supervision to prevent evidence tampering or witness interference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts