PURNIMA NASKAR @ SEPAI JAYANTA KUMAR MUKHOPADHYAY vs THE CESC LTD AND ORS. — WPA/3259/2026
Case under Electricity Act Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 30th March 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0061742026
Filing Number
WPA/3074/2026
Filing Date
09-Feb-2026
Registration No
WPA/3259/2026
Registration Date
10-Feb-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
Miscellaneous ( 5 )
Judicial Branch
MANDAMUS SECTION
Decision Date
30-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 15-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PURNIMA NASKAR @ SEPAI JAYANTA KUMAR MUKHOPADHYAY
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE CESC LTD AND ORS.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan KapurView PDF
Summary In WPA 3259 of 2026, the petitioner Purnima Naskar @ Sepai filed a petition against CESC Ltd. and others. The court disposed of the petition after the petitioner submitted that, upon receiving the Report filed by State respondents, they no longer wished to proceed with the application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Mar-2026
To Be Mentioned
Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur
-
30-Mar-2026
Returnable Motion
Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur
-
25-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan KapurView PDF
-
19-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan KapurView PDF
-
19-Mar-2026
Returnable Motion
Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur
-
11-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan KapurView PDF
-
09-Mar-2026
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur
-
19-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Justice Ravi Krishan KapurView PDF
-
19-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPA/3259/2026
Summary In WPA 3259 of 2026, the petitioner Purnima Naskar @ Sepai filed a petition against CESC Ltd. and others. The court disposed of the petition after the petitioner submitted that, upon receiving the Report filed by State respondents, they no longer wished to proceed with the application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts