PRADIP KUMAR MUKHERJEE ABHIRUP CHAKRABORTY vs ANANTA KUMAR CHAKRABORTYT — CO/461/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 04th May 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0060162026
Filing Number
CO/463/2026
Filing Date
09-Feb-2026
Registration No
CO/461/2026
Registration Date
09-Feb-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )
Sub-Category
Miscellaneous ( 57 )
Judicial Branch
RULE SECTION
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PRADIP KUMAR MUKHERJEE ABHIRUP CHAKRABORTY
Respondent(s)
-
1.ANANTA KUMAR CHAKRABORTYT
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan RaiView PDF
The court disposed of the revisional application by directing the trial court at Barasat to expeditiously dispose of Title Suit No. 268 of 2013 within eight months from the next date fixed, without granting unnecessary adjournments. The court noted the suit had remained pending despite a prior 2023 order requesting disposal within one year, and warned the trial court to ensure the petitioner would not need to approach the higher court again with similar requests. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
Expeditious Disposal Matters
Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai
-
30-Mar-2026
Expeditious Disposal Matters
Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai
-
27-Mar-2026
Expeditious Disposal Matters
Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai
-
02-Mar-2026
Expeditious Disposal Matters
Hon'ble Justice Shampa Sarkar
-
25-Feb-2026
Expeditious Disposal Matters
Hon'ble Justice Shampa Sarkar
-
12-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CO/461/2026
The court disposed of the revisional application by directing the trial court at Barasat to expeditiously dispose of Title Suit No. 268 of 2013 within eight months from the next date fixed, without granting unnecessary adjournments. The court noted the suit had remained pending despite a prior 2023 order requesting disposal within one year, and warned the trial court to ensure the petitioner would not need to approach the higher court again with similar requests. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts