PRIYANKA SARKAR (DAS) AYAN MITRA vs SHYAMAL SARKAR — CO/579/2026
Case under Specific Relief Act ,1963 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 04th May 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0053312026
Next Hearing
18th February 2026
Filing Number
CO/415/2026
Filing Date
04-02-2026
Registration No
CO/579/2026
Registration Date
13-02-2026
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE OM NARAYAN RAI
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE OM NARAYAN RAI
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )
Sub-Category
Miscellaneous ( 57 )
Judicial Branch
RULE SECTION
Decision Date
04th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PRIYANKA SARKAR (DAS) AYAN MITRA
Respondent(s)
SHYAMAL SARKAR
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE OM NARAYAN RAI
NEW MOTION
EXPEDITIOUS DISPOSAL MATTERS
EXPEDITIOUS DISPOSAL MATTERS
EXPEDITIOUS DISPOSAL MATTERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-02-2026 | NEW MOTION |
| 04-05-2026 | EXPEDITIOUS DISPOSAL MATTERS |
| 02-03-2026 | EXPEDITIOUS DISPOSAL MATTERS |
| 25-02-2026 | EXPEDITIOUS DISPOSAL MATTERS |
Orders
Summary of CO 579/2026: The court disposed of Priyanka Sarkar's revisional application seeking expeditious resolution of Matrimonial Suit No. 719 of 2021 pending before the Additional District Judge, Howrah. The court directed the trial judge to dispose of the matrimonial suit as expeditiously as possible, preferably within eight months from the next scheduled date, without granting unnecessary adjournments to either party. The petitioner was required to serve copies of the application and order on the respondent within one week. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of CO 579/2026: The court disposed of Priyanka Sarkar's revisional application seeking expeditious resolution of Matrimonial Suit No. 719 of 2021 pending before the Additional District Judge, Howrah. The court directed the trial judge to dispose of the matrimonial suit as expeditiously as possible, preferably within eight months from the next scheduled date, without granting unnecessary adjournments to either party. The petitioner was required to serve copies of the application and order on the respondent within one week. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts