MD. AZAHAR HOSSAIN RAFIKUL ISLAM SARDAR vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA/2728/2026
Case under West Bengal Board of Secondary Education Act ,1963 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 06th May 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0050742026
Filing Number
WPA/2553/2026
Filing Date
03-Feb-2026
Registration No
WPA/2728/2026
Registration Date
04-Feb-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Bivas Pattanayak
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Bivas Pattanayak
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
In service Other 297 ( 9 )
Judicial Branch
MANDAMUS SECTION
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MD. AZAHAR HOSSAIN RAFIKUL ISLAM SARDAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Justice Bivas PattanayakView PDF
Case Summary: WPA 2728/2026 The High Court at Calcutta dismissed the petitioner's writ petition challenging the rejection of terminal benefits. The court held that although the petitioner had completed 10+ years of service before his 2015 termination, his subsequent fresh engagement in June 2024 (following a 2022 appellate order) constituted a new appointment rather than reinstatement. Since the petitioner served only six months from this fresh engagement before retiring on 31 December 2024, he failed to meet the minimum 10-year continuous service requirement for terminal benefits and was therefore ineligible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-May-2026
Motion 2
Hon'ble Justice Bivas Pattanayak
-
04-May-2026
Motion 2
Hon'ble Justice Bivas Pattanayak
-
22-Apr-2026
Motion 2
Hon'ble Justice Bivas Pattanayak
-
08-Apr-2026
Motion 2
Hon'ble Justice Bivas Pattanayak
-
06-Apr-2026
Motion 2
Hon'ble Justice Bivas Pattanayak
-
01-Apr-2026
Motion 2
Hon'ble Justice Bivas Pattanayak
-
25-Mar-2026
Motion 2
Hon'ble Justice Bivas Pattanayak
-
18-Mar-2026
Motion 2
Hon'ble Justice Bivas Pattanayak
-
11-Mar-2026
Motion 2
Hon'ble Justice Bivas Pattanayak
-
10-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPA/2728/2026
Case Summary: WPA 2728/2026 The High Court at Calcutta dismissed the petitioner's writ petition challenging the rejection of terminal benefits. The court held that although the petitioner had completed 10+ years of service before his 2015 termination, his subsequent fresh engagement in June 2024 (following a 2022 appellate order) constituted a new appointment rather than reinstatement. Since the petitioner served only six months from this fresh engagement before retiring on 31 December 2024, he failed to meet the minimum 10-year continuous service requirement for terminal benefits and was therefore ineligible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts