MANIK DAS OINDRILA SINHA vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA/2656/2026

Case under West Bengal Panchayat Act ,1973 Section NA. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: WBCHCA0049422026

Filing Number

WPA/2497/2026

Filing Date

03-Feb-2026

Registration No

WPA/2656/2026

Registration Date

04-Feb-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Suvra Ghosh

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Suvra Ghosh

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 7 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

West Bengal Panchayat Act ,1973 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANIK DAS OINDRILA SINHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Suvra GhoshView PDF

    Case Summary: WPA No. 2656 of 2026 The case was adjourned pending filing of affidavits. Petitioner Manik Das alleged that private respondents illegally constructed on a water body using a forged conversion certificate not issued by the Block Land and Land Reforms Officer. The court directed private respondents to file an affidavit in opposition within two weeks, with petitioner's reply due within one week thereafter, and retained liberty to mention the case upon completion of affidavits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Suvra Ghosh

  4. 05-May-2026

    Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Suvra Ghosh

  5. 30-Apr-2026

    Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Suvra Ghosh

  6. 28-Apr-2026

    Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Suvra Ghosh

  7. 23-Apr-2026

    Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Suvra Ghosh

  8. 21-Apr-2026

    Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Suvra Ghosh

  9. 16-Apr-2026

    Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Suvra Ghosh

  10. 09-Apr-2026

    Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Suvra Ghosh

  11. 07-Apr-2026

    Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Suvra Ghosh

  12. 04-Apr-2026

    Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Suvra Ghosh

  13. 31-Mar-2026

    Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Suvra Ghosh

  14. 24-Mar-2026

    Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Suvra Ghosh

  15. 24-Mar-2026

    Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Suvra Ghosh

  16. 19-Mar-2026

    Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Suvra Ghosh

  17. 17-Mar-2026

    New Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Suvra Ghosh

  18. 05-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Suvra GhoshView PDF

  19. 05-Mar-2026

    New Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Suvra Ghosh

  20. 02-Mar-2026

    New Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Suvra Ghosh

  21. 27-Feb-2026

    New Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Kausik Chanda

  22. 26-Feb-2026

    New Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Kausik Chanda

  23. 25-Feb-2026

    New Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Kausik Chanda

  24. 24-Feb-2026

    New Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Kausik Chanda

  25. 23-Feb-2026

    New Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Kausik Chanda

  26. 20-Feb-2026

    New Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Kausik Chanda

  27. 19-Feb-2026

    New Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Kausik Chanda

  28. 18-Feb-2026

    New Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Kausik Chanda

  29. 17-Feb-2026

    New Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Kausik Chanda

  30. 16-Feb-2026

    New Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Kausik Chanda

  31. 13-Feb-2026

    New Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Kausik Chanda

  32. 12-Feb-2026

    New Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Kausik Chanda

  33. 11-Feb-2026

    New Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Kausik Chanda

  34. 10-Feb-2026

    New Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Kausik Chanda

  35. 09-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  36. 03-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPA/2656/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPA No. 2656 of 2026 The case was adjourned pending filing of affidavits. Petitioner Manik Das alleged that private respondents illegally constructed on a water body using a forged conversion certificate not issued by the Block Land and Land Reforms Officer. The court directed private respondents to file an affidavit in opposition within two weeks, with petitioner's reply due within one week thereafter, and retained liberty to mention the case upon completion of affidavits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case