LAKSHMI KANTA KHANRA RAJ KUMAR SAIN vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA/2279/2025

Case under Land Acquisition Act ,1894 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 23rd February 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 18-Feb-2025

CNR: WBCHCA0043642025

Filing Number

WPA/2096/2025

Filing Date

28-Jan-2025

Registration No

WPA/2279/2025

Registration Date

28-Jan-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 16 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Decision Date

23-Feb-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 27-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act ,1894 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.LAKSHMI KANTA KHANRA RAJ KUMAR SAIN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Hiranmay BhattacharyyaView PDF

    The court ordered correction of clerical errors in its previous order dated 23rd February, 2026: the Police Station was wrongly mentioned as "Purba Medinipur" instead of "Mahishadal," and the Block Land & Land Reforms Officer was incorrectly listed as respondent no.3 instead of no.4. The department was directed to rectify these errors in any certified copies already issued. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Hiranmay BhattacharyyaView PDF

  4. 07-Jul-2025

    Listed Motion 1

    Hon'ble Justice Partha Sarathi Sen

  5. 03-Mar-2025

    Motion (Land Matters)

    Hon'ble Justice Aniruddha Roy

  6. 18-Feb-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 28-Jan-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPA/2279/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court ordered correction of clerical errors in its previous order dated 23rd February, 2026: the Police Station was wrongly mentioned as "Purba Medinipur" instead of "Mahishadal," and the Block Land & Land Reforms Officer was incorrectly listed as respondent no.3 instead of no.4. The department was directed to rectify these errors in any certified copies already issued. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case