CHAITALI CHOUDHURY PRASAD BHATTACHARYYA vs SANJAY CHATTERJEE AND ANR. — CO/387/2026
Case under Consumer Protection Act Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 04th May 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0043182026
Next Hearing
06th February 2026
Filing Number
CO/329/2026
Filing Date
29-01-2026
Registration No
CO/387/2026
Registration Date
03-02-2026
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE OM NARAYAN RAI
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE OM NARAYAN RAI
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )
Sub-Category
Miscellaneous ( 57 )
Judicial Branch
RULE SECTION
Decision Date
04th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
CHAITALI CHOUDHURY PRASAD BHATTACHARYYA
Respondent(s)
SANJAY CHATTERJEE AND ANR.
SIKHARANI BHATTACHARJEE
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE OM NARAYAN RAI
NEW MOTION
EXPEDITIOUS DISPOSAL MATTERS
EXPEDITIOUS DISPOSAL MATTERS
EXPEDITIOUS DISPOSAL MATTERS
EXPEDITIOUS DISPOSAL MATTERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-02-2026 | NEW MOTION |
| 04-05-2026 | EXPEDITIOUS DISPOSAL MATTERS |
| 06-04-2026 | EXPEDITIOUS DISPOSAL MATTERS |
| 02-03-2026 | EXPEDITIOUS DISPOSAL MATTERS |
| 25-02-2026 | EXPEDITIOUS DISPOSAL MATTERS |
Orders
The High Court disposed of the revisional application seeking expeditious disposal of Complaint Case No.270 of 2022, which was pending at the argument stage before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Kolkata. The court directed the Commission to dispose of the complaint as expeditiously as possible, preferably within one month, without granting unnecessary adjournments to either party. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court disposed of the revisional application seeking expeditious disposal of Complaint Case No.270 of 2022, which was pending at the argument stage before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Kolkata. The court directed the Commission to dispose of the complaint as expeditiously as possible, preferably within one month, without granting unnecessary adjournments to either party. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts