CHAITALI CHOUDHURY PRASAD BHATTACHARYYA vs SANJAY CHATTERJEE AND ORS. — CO/322/2026

Case under Consumer Protection Act Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 04th May 2026.

CNR: WBCHCA0043002026

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

03rd February 2026

Filing Number

CO/328/2026

Filing Date

29-01-2026

Registration No

CO/322/2026

Registration Date

29-01-2026

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE OM NARAYAN RAI

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE OM NARAYAN RAI

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 57 )

Judicial Branch

RULE SECTION

Decision Date

04th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Acts & Sections

Consumer Protection Act Section NA

Petitioner(s)

CHAITALI CHOUDHURY PRASAD BHATTACHARYYA

Respondent(s)

SANJAY CHATTERJEE AND ORS.

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE OM NARAYAN RAI

03-02-2026

NEW MOTION

04-05-2026

EXPEDITIOUS DISPOSAL MATTERS

06-04-2026

EXPEDITIOUS DISPOSAL MATTERS

02-03-2026

EXPEDITIOUS DISPOSAL MATTERS

25-02-2026

EXPEDITIOUS DISPOSAL MATTERS

Orders

04-05-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE OM NARAYAN RAI

Summary of CO 322/2026: The court disposed of this revisional application seeking expeditious disposal of a consumer complaint pending before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Kolkata. The court directed the Commission to dispose of Complaint Case No. 269 of 2022 as expeditiously as possible, preferably within one month from the next date fixed, without granting unnecessary adjournments to either party. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CO 322/2026: The court disposed of this revisional application seeking expeditious disposal of a consumer complaint pending before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Kolkata. The court directed the Commission to dispose of Complaint Case No. 269 of 2022 as expeditiously as possible, preferably within one month from the next date fixed, without granting unnecessary adjournments to either party. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case