YUSUB SEIKH @ YUSUB SK MD. GOLAM NURE IMROHI vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL — CRM(M) /292/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 25th March 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0042552026
Next Hearing
04th February 2026
Filing Number
CRM(M) /255/2026
Filing Date
29-01-2026
Registration No
CRM(M) /292/2026
Registration Date
30-01-2026
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE TIRTHANKAR GHOSH
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE TIRTHANKAR GHOSH
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )
Sub-Category
Bail/Cancellation of bail ( 11 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL SECTION
Decision Date
25th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
YUSUB SEIKH @ YUSUB SK MD. GOLAM NURE IMROHI
Respondent(s)
STATE OF WEST BENGAL
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE TIRTHANKAR GHOSH
APPLICATION FOR BAIL
APPLICATION FOR BAIL
APPLICATION FOR BAIL
APPLICATION FOR BAIL
APPLICATION FOR BAIL
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 04-02-2026 | APPLICATION FOR BAIL | |
| 24-02-2026 | APPLICATION FOR BAIL | |
| 20-02-2026 | APPLICATION FOR BAIL | |
| 19-02-2026 | APPLICATION FOR BAIL | |
| 17-02-2026 | APPLICATION FOR BAIL |
Orders
The Calcutta High Court disposed of Yusub Seikh's bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (murder charge) by directing the trial court to grant him bail if the prosecution fails to complete witness examination within 60 days from April 22, 2026. The court considered that the petitioner had been in custody for over 2 years with minimal trial progress since September 2025, and imposed a condition requiring the petitioner's cooperation in ongoing trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Calcutta High Court disposed of Yusub Seikh's bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (murder charge) by directing the trial court to grant him bail if the prosecution fails to complete witness examination within 60 days from April 22, 2026. The court considered that the petitioner had been in custody for over 2 years with minimal trial progress since September 2025, and imposed a condition requiring the petitioner's cooperation in ongoing trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts