SHASHIKANTA MALI KUNAL GANGULY vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL — CRM(M)/251/2026
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 439. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 25th March 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0034942026
Filing Number
CRM(M)/214/2026
Filing Date
22-Jan-2026
Registration No
CRM(M)/251/2026
Registration Date
27-Jan-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Tirthankar Ghosh
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Tirthankar Ghosh
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )
Sub-Category
Bail/Cancellation of bail ( 11 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL SECTION
Decision Date
25-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 15-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHASHIKANTA MALI KUNAL GANGULY
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Justice Tirthankar GhoshView PDF
Summary The Calcutta High Court rejected Shashikant Mali's bail application in a serious dacoity and robbery case, finding him allegedly part of a conspiracy despite claims he merely harbored offenders. The court directed that at least 50% of prosecution witnesses be examined within three months, allowing the petitioner to reapproach the court thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
03-Mar-2026
Application For Bail
Hon'ble Justice Tirthankar Ghosh
-
26-Feb-2026
Application For Bail
Hon'ble Justice Tirthankar Ghosh
-
12-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Justice Tirthankar GhoshView PDF
-
12-Feb-2026
Application For Bail
Hon'ble Justice Tirthankar Ghosh
-
11-Feb-2026
Application For Bail
Hon'ble Justice Tirthankar Ghosh
-
10-Feb-2026
Application For Bail
Hon'ble Justice Tirthankar Ghosh
-
09-Feb-2026
Application For Bail
Hon'ble Justice Tirthankar Ghosh
-
06-Feb-2026
Application For Bail
Hon'ble Justice Tirthankar Ghosh
-
05-Feb-2026
Application For Bail
Hon'ble Justice Tirthankar Ghosh
-
04-Feb-2026
Application For Bail
Hon'ble Justice Tirthankar Ghosh
-
30-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRM(M)/251/2026
Summary The Calcutta High Court rejected Shashikant Mali's bail application in a serious dacoity and robbery case, finding him allegedly part of a conspiracy despite claims he merely harbored offenders. The court directed that at least 50% of prosecution witnesses be examined within three months, allowing the petitioner to reapproach the court thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts