SHASHIKANTA MALI KUNAL GANGULY vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL — CRM(M) /251/2026

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure ,1973 Section 439. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 25th March 2026.

CNR: WBCHCA0034942026

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

30th January 2026

Filing Number

CRM(M) /214/2026

Filing Date

22-01-2026

Registration No

CRM(M) /251/2026

Registration Date

27-01-2026

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE TIRTHANKAR GHOSH

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE TIRTHANKAR GHOSH

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )

Sub-Category

Bail/Cancellation of bail ( 11 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL SECTION

Decision Date

25th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure ,1973 Section 439
THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 483
Indian Penal Code Act ,1860 Section 395/397/307/186/333/353/427/506/120B/412
ARMS ACT Section 25/27/35

Petitioner(s)

SHASHIKANTA MALI KUNAL GANGULY

Respondent(s)

STATE OF WEST BENGAL

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE TIRTHANKAR GHOSH

30-01-2026

APPLICATION FOR BAIL

26-02-2026

APPLICATION FOR BAIL

12-02-2026

APPLICATION FOR BAIL

11-02-2026

APPLICATION FOR BAIL

10-02-2026

APPLICATION FOR BAIL

Orders

25-03-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE TIRTHANKAR GHOSH

Summary The Calcutta High Court rejected Shashikant Mali's bail application in a serious dacoity and robbery case, finding him allegedly part of a conspiracy despite claims he merely harbored offenders. The court directed that at least 50% of prosecution witnesses be examined within three months, allowing the petitioner to reapproach the court thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Calcutta High Court rejected Shashikant Mali's bail application in a serious dacoity and robbery case, finding him allegedly part of a conspiracy despite claims he merely harbored offenders. The court directed that at least 50% of prosecution witnesses be examined within three months, allowing the petitioner to reapproach the court thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case