The State of West Bengal through the Chief Secretary Government of West Bengal AND ORS Avik Ghatak vs Latika Ghose and ORS — FMA/117/2026

Case under Mines and Minerals (development and Regulation ) Act ,1957 Section 226. Next hearing: : -.

CNR: WBCHCA0031022026

Next Hearing

: -

e-Filing Number

21-01-2026

Filing Number

MAT/104/2026

Filing Date

21-01-2026

Registration No

FMA/117/2026

Registration Date

21-01-2026

Judge

HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL , HON'BLE JUSTICE PARTHA SARATHI SEN

Coram

HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL , HON'BLE JUSTICE PARTHA SARATHI SEN

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 7 )

Judicial Branch

FIRST MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL (FMA) SECTION

Acts & Sections

Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation ) Act ,1957 Section 226

Petitioner(s)

The State of West Bengal through the Chief Secretary Government of West Bengal AND ORS Avik Ghatak

The Home Secretary, Department of Home Police, Government of West Bengal

Adv. Avik Ghatak

DIG/CID, West Bengal, Government of West Bengal

Adv. Avik Ghatak

The District Magistrate, Hooghly

Adv. Avik Ghatak

Superintendent of Police, Chinsurah

Adv. Avik Ghatak

The Officer in Charge of Jangipara

Adv. Avik Ghatak

Respondent(s)

Latika Ghose and ORS

The State Human Rights Commission through the Chairman State Human Rights Commission,

The Chairman, State Human Rights Commission,

The Central Bureau of Investigation

Tapas Broti Chakraborty

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL , HON'BLE JUSTICE PARTHA SARATHI SEN

28-01-2026

FOR ADMISSION

06-05-2026

POLICE INACTION

23-04-2026

POLICE INACTION

22-04-2026

POLICE INACTION

21-04-2026

POLICE INACTION

Orders

06-05-2026
HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL,HON'BLE JUSTICE PARTHA SARATHI SEN

In FMA 117/2026, the court noted that no counsel appeared for the appellant (State of West Bengal and others), while respondent no.5 was represented. The matter was adjourned and listed for hearing after Summer Vacation, with no substantive order passed on the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

In FMA 117/2026, the court noted that no counsel appeared for the appellant (State of West Bengal and others), while respondent no.5 was represented. The matter was adjourned and listed for hearing after Summer Vacation, with no substantive order passed on the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case