BIMAL CHAKRABARTI BANSHI BADAN MAITY vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA/1727/2026

Case under West Bengal Board of Primary Education Act ,1973 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 29-Jan-2026

CNR: WBCHCA0030922026

Filing Number

WPA/1536/2026

Filing Date

21-Jan-2026

Registration No

WPA/1727/2026

Registration Date

22-Jan-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Bivas Pattanayak

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Bivas Pattanayak

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

Post Retirement 90 ( 10 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

West Bengal Board of Primary Education Act ,1973 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BIMAL CHAKRABARTI BANSHI BADAN MAITY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Bivas PattanayakView PDF

    Case Summary: WPA/1727/2026 The High Court at Calcutta disposed of the writ petition allowing the petitioner, Bimal Chakrabarti (husband of deceased teacher Sandhya Chakrabarti), to claim family pension by depositing the government's employer share in the Contributory Provident Fund with interest. Since the deceased employee had already exercised the ROPA 1990 option during her lifetime, no fresh option was required from the petitioner. The court directed the District Inspector of Schools to calculate the refundable amount, and upon deposit, process the pension papers for issuance of the Pension Payment Order, with pension payable from the date of the deceased's retirement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 29-Jan-2026

    New Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Bivas Pattanayak

  4. 21-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPA/1727/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPA/1727/2026 The High Court at Calcutta disposed of the writ petition allowing the petitioner, Bimal Chakrabarti (husband of deceased teacher Sandhya Chakrabarti), to claim family pension by depositing the government's employer share in the Contributory Provident Fund with interest. Since the deceased employee had already exercised the ROPA 1990 option during her lifetime, no fresh option was required from the petitioner. The court directed the District Inspector of Schools to calculate the refundable amount, and upon deposit, process the pension papers for issuance of the Pension Payment Order, with pension payable from the date of the deceased's retirement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case