SHYAMALI GAYEN @ SHYAMALI GAYEN SAMANTA SUDIPTA MAITI vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA/1732/2026

Case under West Bengal Board of Primary Education Act ,1973 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 29-Jan-2026

CNR: WBCHCA0030082026

Filing Number

WPA/1494/2026

Filing Date

21-Jan-2026

Registration No

WPA/1732/2026

Registration Date

22-Jan-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Bivas Pattanayak

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Bivas Pattanayak

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

Post Retirement 90 ( 10 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

West Bengal Board of Primary Education Act ,1973 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHYAMALI GAYEN @ SHYAMALI GAYEN SAMANTA SUDIPTA MAITI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Bivas PattanayakView PDF

    The High Court of Calcutta allowed the widow's writ petition seeking family pension by directing her to refund the government's share of the Contributory Provident Fund with interest and additional interest. The court held that since the deceased husband had exercised an option under ROPA 1990, no fresh option was required, and upon payment of the calculated refund amount, the pension sanctioning authority must verify and process the pension papers for issuance of the Pension Payment Order, with pension to be paid from the next date of the husband's retirement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 29-Jan-2026

    New Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Bivas Pattanayak

  4. 21-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPA/1732/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Calcutta allowed the widow's writ petition seeking family pension by directing her to refund the government's share of the Contributory Provident Fund with interest and additional interest. The court held that since the deceased husband had exercised an option under ROPA 1990, no fresh option was required, and upon payment of the calculated refund amount, the pension sanctioning authority must verify and process the pension papers for issuance of the Pension Payment Order, with pension to be paid from the next date of the husband's retirement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case