MOHAMMAD BABLU MISTRI AND ORS. SOUVIK DAS vs AKBAR ALI MISTRI AND ORS. — CO/237/2026

Case under Specific Relief Act ,1963 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 28-Jan-2026

CNR: WBCHCA0029962026

Filing Number

CO/236/2026

Filing Date

21-Jan-2026

Registration No

CO/237/2026

Registration Date

21-Jan-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai

Bench Type

Single Bench

Judicial Branch

RULE SECTION

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act ,1963 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MOHAMMAD BABLU MISTRI AND ORS. SOUVIK DAS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AKBAR ALI MISTRI AND ORS.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan RaiView PDF

    Case Summary: CO/237/2026 The High Court at Calcutta set aside the lower court's November 17, 2025 order appointing an Advocate Commissioner and instead directed appointment of a Survey Passed Commissioner to identify the suit property (Dag No. 2013/2114) in execution proceedings. The court found that land identification requires forensic/technical expertise unsuitable for an advocate, and the lower court was requested to complete the appointment within one month. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Extension Of Interim Order

    Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai

  4. 04-May-2026

    Extension Of Interim Order

    Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai

  5. 30-Apr-2026

    Extension Of Interim Order

    Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai

  6. 16-Mar-2026

    New Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Shampa Sarkar

  7. 09-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Shampa SarkarView PDF

  8. 09-Feb-2026

    Urgent Matters

    Hon'ble Justice Shampa Sarkar

  9. 28-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 21-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CO/237/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CO/237/2026 The High Court at Calcutta set aside the lower court's November 17, 2025 order appointing an Advocate Commissioner and instead directed appointment of a Survey Passed Commissioner to identify the suit property (Dag No. 2013/2114) in execution proceedings. The court found that land identification requires forensic/technical expertise unsuitable for an advocate, and the lower court was requested to complete the appointment within one month. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case