NUR ALAM SK ANISUR RAHMAN vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR — CRM(M) /201/2026
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure ,1973 Section 439. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 25th March 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0026142026
Next Hearing
27th January 2026
Filing Number
CRM(M) /154/2026
Filing Date
19-01-2026
Registration No
CRM(M) /201/2026
Registration Date
20-01-2026
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE TIRTHANKAR GHOSH
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE TIRTHANKAR GHOSH
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )
Sub-Category
Bail/Cancellation of bail ( 11 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL SECTION
Decision Date
25th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
NUR ALAM SK ANISUR RAHMAN
Respondent(s)
STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR
X X X X X VICTIM GIRL
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE TIRTHANKAR GHOSH
APPLICATION FOR BAIL
APPLICATION FOR BAIL
APPLICATION FOR BAIL
APPLICATION FOR BAIL
APPLICATION FOR BAIL
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 27-01-2026 | APPLICATION FOR BAIL | |
| 20-02-2026 | APPLICATION FOR BAIL | |
| 19-02-2026 | APPLICATION FOR BAIL | |
| 11-02-2026 | APPLICATION FOR BAIL | |
| 10-02-2026 | APPLICATION FOR BAIL |
Orders
The court granted bail to Nur Alam Sk, who had been in custody for approximately 2 years 4 months on charges including aggravated sexual assault and child marriage offenses. The court found that given the slow trial progress (only 6 of 24 witnesses examined), there was no reasonable prospect of timely trial completion, warranting release on bail with a Rs. 20,000 bond and two sureties of Rs. 10,000 each, subject to conditions including mandatory court appearances and restriction from leaving Murshidabad district. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court granted bail to Nur Alam Sk, who had been in custody for approximately 2 years 4 months on charges including aggravated sexual assault and child marriage offenses. The court found that given the slow trial progress (only 6 of 24 witnesses examined), there was no reasonable prospect of timely trial completion, warranting release on bail with a Rs. 20,000 bond and two sureties of Rs. 10,000 each, subject to conditions including mandatory court appearances and restriction from leaving Murshidabad district. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts