SRI RATHINDRA NATH PURKAIT MR.RAMAPATI ROY vs SRI PUNDARI KAKSHYA HALDER SINCE DECEASED SMT. NIYATI SARDAR AND ORS. — SA/320/1988
Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 19th May 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0025151988
Filing Number
SA/2515/1988
Filing Date
18-Jun-1986
Registration No
SA/320/1988
Registration Date
18-Jun-1986
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Sugato Majumdar
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Sugato Majumdar
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )
Sub-Category
Possession ( 38 )
Judicial Branch
SECOND APPEAL (SA) SECTION
Decision Date
19-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Last updated 29-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SRI RATHINDRA NATH PURKAIT MR.RAMAPATI ROY
Respondent(s)
-
1.SRI PUNDARI KAKSHYA HALDER SINCE DECEASED SMT. NIYATI SARDAR AND ORS.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
19-May-2026
Hon'ble Justice Sugato MajumdarView PDF
-
19-May-2026
Hon'ble Justice Sugato MajumdarView PDF
-
19-May-2026
Hon'ble Justice Sugato MajumdarView PDF
-
19-May-2026
Hon'ble Justice Sugato MajumdarView PDF
-
19-May-2026
Hon'ble Justice Sugato MajumdarView PDF
-
19-May-2026
Hon'ble Justice Sugato MajumdarView PDF
The appeal (SA 320/1988) filed by Sri Rathindra Nath Purkait against Sri Pundari Kakshya Halder (deceased) and others was dismissed for default on 19.05.2026, as the appellant failed to appear on repeated court occasions. All pending applications were also dismissed and case records returned. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-May-2026
Hearing
Hon'ble Justice Sugato Majumdar
-
28-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Justice Sugato MajumdarView PDF
-
28-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Jun-1986
Case filed
Registration No. SA/320/1988
The appeal (SA 320/1988) filed by Sri Rathindra Nath Purkait against Sri Pundari Kakshya Halder (deceased) and others was dismissed for default on 19.05.2026, as the appellant failed to appear on repeated court occasions. All pending applications were also dismissed and case records returned. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts