RANJIT KUMAR GHOSH BRATATI PRAMANICK vs HOWRAH MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS — WPA/778/2026

Case under Howrah Municipal Corporation Act ,1980 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 14th January 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 16-Jan-2026

CNR: WBCHCA0015532026

Filing Number

WPA/790/2026

Filing Date

13-Jan-2026

Registration No

WPA/778/2026

Registration Date

13-Jan-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Raja Basu Chowdhury

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Raja Basu Chowdhury

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

MUNICIPAL LICENCE ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Decision Date

14-Jan-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Howrah Municipal Corporation Act ,1980 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RANJIT KUMAR GHOSH BRATATI PRAMANICK

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HOWRAH MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Raja Basu ChowdhuryView PDF

    The High Court at Calcutta dismissed a third party's application (CAN 2 of 2026) seeking recall of a January 14, 2026 order, finding the applicant failed to serve the other parties to the proceedings. The court removed the matter from the list and granted liberty to mention after proper service is completed, without deciding the application's maintainability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Application

    Hon'ble Justice Raja Basu Chowdhury

  4. 04-May-2026

    Application

    Hon'ble Justice Raja Basu Chowdhury

  5. 03-May-2026

    Application

    Hon'ble Justice Raja Basu Chowdhury

  6. 16-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 13-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPA/778/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court at Calcutta dismissed a third party's application (CAN 2 of 2026) seeking recall of a January 14, 2026 order, finding the applicant failed to serve the other parties to the proceedings. The court removed the matter from the list and granted liberty to mention after proper service is completed, without deciding the application's maintainability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case