KAMAL NAHA AND ANR. ADITYA KUMAR SONAR vs KOLKATA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS. — WPA/702/2025
Case under Kolkata Municipal Corporation Act ,1980 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 06th May 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0011152025
Next Hearing
17th January 2025
Filing Number
WPA/515/2025
Filing Date
08-01-2025
Registration No
WPA/702/2025
Registration Date
09-01-2025
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJA BASU CHOWDHURY
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJA BASU CHOWDHURY
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
Miscellaneous ( 12 )
Judicial Branch
MANDAMUS SECTION
Decision Date
06th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KAMAL NAHA AND ANR. ADITYA KUMAR SONAR
Respondent(s)
KOLKATA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS.
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJA BASU CHOWDHURY
NEW MOTION
MOTION
MOTION
FOR DISMISSAL
NEW MOTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-01-2025 | NEW MOTION |
| 03-05-2026 | MOTION |
| 04-05-2026 | MOTION |
| 04-05-2026 | FOR DISMISSAL |
| 18-02-2026 | NEW MOTION |
Orders
Summary of WPA 702/2025 (Kamal Naha & Anr. v. Kolkata Municipal Corporation & Ors.) The court dismissed the petition seeking to strike off the private respondent's name as owner of property at 18A Sarat Ghosh Street, Kolkata. The petitioners claimed ownership through probate of a 1986 will, but the respondent's name was recorded following a 2012 civil court decree (currently stayed in second appeal). The court found no irregularity in the municipality's 2014 mutation and directed petitioners to approach the court again only if they succeed in their pending second appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of WPA 702/2025 (Kamal Naha & Anr. v. Kolkata Municipal Corporation & Ors.) The court dismissed the petition seeking to strike off the private respondent's name as owner of property at 18A Sarat Ghosh Street, Kolkata. The petitioners claimed ownership through probate of a 1986 will, but the respondent's name was recorded following a 2012 civil court decree (currently stayed in second appeal). The court found no irregularity in the municipality's 2014 mutation and directed petitioners to approach the court again only if they succeed in their pending second appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts