UNITED CONTRACTORS REPD BY RUPAK DAS SARMA KRISHNA YADAV vs REBA RAHA CHAIRPERSON BHATPARA MUNICIPALITY — CPAN/43/2025

Case under Contempt of Courts Act Section NA. Next hearing: 02nd July 2026.

Next hearing 02-Jul-2026

CNR: WBCHCA0010862025

Filing Number

CPAN/44/2025

Filing Date

08-Jan-2025

Registration No

CPAN/43/2025

Registration Date

08-Jan-2025

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )

Sub-Category

Civil Contempt ( 8 )

Judicial Branch

FIRST MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL (FMA) SECTION

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Contempt of Courts Act Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.UNITED CONTRACTORS REPD BY RUPAK DAS SARMA KRISHNA YADAV

  2. 2.RUPAK DAS SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.REBA RAHA CHAIRPERSON BHATPARA MUNICIPALITY

Case History

  1. 02-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 02-Jul-2026

    Application

    Hon'ble Justice Amrita Sinha

  3. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Amrita SinhaView PDF

    Case Summary: CPAN 43/2025 The High Court at Calcutta issued a Contempt Rule against respondent Smt. Reba Raha for non-compliance with a previous court order, despite proper service of notice. The contempt rule is returnable on 2nd July 2026. The court clarified that the pendency of contempt proceedings will not prevent the respondent from complying with the original order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 19-Jun-2025

    Application 1

    Hon'ble Justice Amrita Sinha

  5. 10-Apr-2025

    Hon'ble Justice Amrita SinhaView PDF

  6. 10-Apr-2025

    Application 1

    Hon'ble Justice Amrita Sinha

  7. 14-Jan-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 08-Jan-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CPAN/43/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CPAN 43/2025 The High Court at Calcutta issued a Contempt Rule against respondent Smt. Reba Raha for non-compliance with a previous court order, despite proper service of notice. The contempt rule is returnable on 2nd July 2026. The court clarified that the pendency of contempt proceedings will not prevent the respondent from complying with the original order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case