JHUMA BHATTACHARYYA CHIRANJIB SINHA vs ABHIJIT BHATTACHARYA AND ANR — CO/82/2026

Case under Specific Relief Act ,1963 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 12th June 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 19-Jan-2026

CNR: WBCHCA0010552026

Filing Number

CO/79/2026

Filing Date

08-Jan-2026

Registration No

CO/82/2026

Registration Date

08-Jan-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 57 )

Judicial Branch

RULE SECTION

Decision Date

12-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 13-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act ,1963 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JHUMA BHATTACHARYYA CHIRANJIB SINHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ABHIJIT BHATTACHARYA AND ANR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan RaiView PDF

    Case Summary: CO/82/2026 The court dismissed Jhuma Bhattacharyya's revisional petition challenging the trial court's rejection of her amendment application. The petitioner sought to add a counter-claim for her share in properties (11 and 11A Ruby Park) during the evidence stage of a partition suit. The court upheld the rejection, finding the petitioner lacked due diligence in filing the amendment after trial commenced, especially since the factual basis was within her knowledge. Critically, a prior partition suit (Title Suit 153/2015) concerning the same properties was already pending before the same court, making the counter-claim unnecessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Jun-2026

    Upgraded Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai

  4. 11-Jun-2026

    Upgraded Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai

  5. 19-May-2026

    Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai

  6. 18-May-2026

    Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai

  7. 15-May-2026

    Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai

  8. 14-May-2026

    Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai

  9. 13-May-2026

    Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai

  10. 12-May-2026

    Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai

  11. 11-May-2026

    Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai

  12. 08-May-2026

    Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai

  13. 07-May-2026

    Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai

  14. 06-May-2026

    Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai

  15. 05-May-2026

    Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai

  16. 04-May-2026

    Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai

  17. 30-Apr-2026

    Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai

  18. 20-Apr-2026

    Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai

  19. 17-Apr-2026

    Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai

  20. 16-Apr-2026

    Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai

  21. 13-Apr-2026

    Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai

  22. 10-Apr-2026

    Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai

  23. 09-Apr-2026

    Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai

  24. 08-Apr-2026

    Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai

  25. 07-Apr-2026

    Motion 3

    Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai

  26. 06-Apr-2026

    Motion 3

    Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai

  27. 02-Apr-2026

    Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai

  28. 21-Jan-2026

    New Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Shampa Sarkar

  29. 19-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  30. 08-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CO/82/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CO/82/2026 The court dismissed Jhuma Bhattacharyya's revisional petition challenging the trial court's rejection of her amendment application. The petitioner sought to add a counter-claim for her share in properties (11 and 11A Ruby Park) during the evidence stage of a partition suit. The court upheld the rejection, finding the petitioner lacked due diligence in filing the amendment after trial commenced, especially since the factual basis was within her knowledge. Critically, a prior partition suit (Title Suit 153/2015) concerning the same properties was already pending before the same court, making the counter-claim unnecessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case