SARAT CHANDRA SIL AMAL KUMAR SAHA vs SANTOSH KUMAR SIL — COT/1/2021

Case under West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act ,1956 Section NA. Disposed: --DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 19th May 2026.

CNR: WBCHCA0001492021

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

07th January 2021

Filing Number

COT/1/2021

Filing Date

04-01-2021

Registration No

COT/1/2021

Registration Date

04-01-2021

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE DEBANGSU BASAK , HON'BLE JUSTICE MD. SHABBAR RASHIDI

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE DEBANGSU BASAK , HON'BLE JUSTICE MD. SHABBAR RASHIDI

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )

Sub-Category

Cross Appeal/objection ( 14 )

Judicial Branch

STAMP REPORTER (SR) SECTION

Decision Date

19th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT

Acts & Sections

West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act ,1956 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

SARAT CHANDRA SIL AMAL KUMAR SAHA

Respondent(s)

SANTOSH KUMAR SIL

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE DEBANGSU BASAK , HON'BLE JUSTICE MD. SHABBAR RASHIDI

07-01-2021

FOR ADMISSION

13-05-2026

ASSIGNED MATTERS

12-05-2026

ASSIGNED MATTERS

11-05-2026

ASSIGNED MATTERS

08-05-2026

ASSIGNED MATTERS

Orders

19-05-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE DEBANGSU BASAK,HON'BLE JUSTICE MD. SHABBAR RASHIDI

The High Court at Calcutta dismissed appeals FA/472/2025 and FA/473/2025 along with connected applications for default on 19.05.2026. The appellant's counsel failed to proceed with the appeal despite the court's request, and the court refused the prayer for adjournment, resulting in dismissal for non-prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court at Calcutta dismissed appeals FA/472/2025 and FA/473/2025 along with connected applications for default on 19.05.2026. The appellant's counsel failed to proceed with the appeal despite the court's request, and the court refused the prayer for adjournment, resulting in dismissal for non-prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case