MANGALA PRASAD ROY ROHAN BAVISHI vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR — CRR/37/2026

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 483. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 10th April 2026.

CNR: WBCHCA0000892026

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

07th January 2026

Filing Number

CRR/11/2026

Filing Date

02-01-2026

Registration No

CRR/37/2026

Registration Date

03-01-2026

Judge

HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE AJOY KUMAR MUKHERJEE

Coram

HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE AJOY KUMAR MUKHERJEE

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )

Sub-Category

Exercise of inherent power u/s 482 Cr. P. C. ( 40 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL SECTION

Decision Date

10th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 483
The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 529
Indian Penal Code Act ,1860 Section 323/325/326

Petitioner(s)

MANGALA PRASAD ROY ROHAN BAVISHI

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR

ASHISH CHAKRABORTY

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE AJOY KUMAR MUKHERJEE

07-01-2026

NEW MOTION

16-04-2026

UPGRADED MATTERS

09-04-2026

UPGRADED MATTERS

02-04-2026

UPGRADED MATTERS

19-03-2026

UPGRADED MATTERS

Orders

10-04-2026
HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE AJOY KUMAR MUKHERJEE

Summary The West Bengal High Court granted Dr. Mangala Prasad Roy's petition for expeditious disposal of a criminal case pending since 2020 involving charges under IPC sections 323/325/326. The court directed the trial court to conclude the proceedings within six months from the next hearing date, recognizing the petitioner's hardship due to prolonged pendency where only two of six prosecution witnesses have been examined. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The West Bengal High Court granted Dr. Mangala Prasad Roy's petition for expeditious disposal of a criminal case pending since 2020 involving charges under IPC sections 323/325/326. The court directed the trial court to conclude the proceedings within six months from the next hearing date, recognizing the petitioner's hardship due to prolonged pendency where only two of six prosecution witnesses have been examined. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case