ASHOK KASHINATH KARPE AND ORS. vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS. Advocate - GP WRIT CELL, RESP NO. 1 TO 4 — WP/303/2019
Case under Land Acquisition Act. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HCBM070583872018
Filing Number
WP/36508/2018
Filing Date
20-Dec-2018
Registration No
WP/303/2019
Registration Date
09-Jan-2019
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil Laxman Pansare , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ranjitsinha Raja Bhonsale
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil Laxman Pansare , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ranjitsinha Raja Bhonsale
Bench Type
Division
Category
LAND LAWS AND AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES ( 21 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ASHOK KASHINATH KARPE AND ORS.
Adv. Ramdas Hake Patil
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS. Advocate - GP WRIT CELL, RESP NO. 1 TO 4
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
05-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil Laxman Pansare,hon'ble Shri Justice Ranjitsinha Raja BhonsaleView PDF
The writ petition was adjourned. The court granted time to the State's counsel to file an affidavit-in-reply within fourteen working days. The petitioner's counsel was directed to serve an additional copy of the petition to the State for filing the reply, with the case to be listed thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Feb-2023
Due Admission - 1
Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh , Hon'ble Shri Justice Nitin Jamdar
-
04-Nov-2020
For Admission
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Anuja Prabhudessai , Hon'ble Shri Justice A.A. Sayed
-
02-Jul-2019
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prakash D. Naik,hon'ble Shri Justice A.A. SayedView PDF
-
02-Jul-2019
For Circulation
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prakash D. Naik , Hon'ble Shri Justice A.A. Sayed
-
17-Jan-2019
Hon'ble Shri Justice V.L. Achliya,hon'ble Shri Justice R.M. BordeView PDF
-
17-Jan-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Dec-2018
Case filed
Registration No. WP/303/2019
The writ petition was adjourned. The court granted time to the State's counsel to file an affidavit-in-reply within fourteen working days. The petitioner's counsel was directed to serve an additional copy of the petition to the State for filing the reply, with the case to be listed thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts