NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED THR MUMBAI REGIONAL OFFICE-II vs SMT. VANDANA MANOJ@LAHU GAIKWAD AND ORS. Advocate - ANVIL S KALEKAR, RESP. NO. 1 TO 3 — HCBM70561952017
Case under Motor Vehicles Act,1939 Section 173. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HCBM070561952017
Filing Number
FA/36719/2017
Filing Date
22-Dec-2017
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Pravin Sheshrao Patil , National Lok Adalat
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Pravin Sheshrao Patil , National Lok Adalat
Bench Type
Single
Category
COMPENSATION ( 7 )
Sub-Category
INSURER LIABILITY MATTERS ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED THR MUMBAI REGIONAL OFFICE-II
Adv. S S DWIVEDI
Respondent(s)
-
1.SMT. VANDANA MANOJ@LAHU GAIKWAD AND ORS. Advocate - ANVIL S KALEKAR, RESP. NO. 1 TO 3
-
2.KUM.VAIJAINTIMALA MANOJ GAIKWAD (RESPONDENT NO.2 IS MINOR THROUGH HER RESPONDENT NO.1 MOTHER)
-
3.SMT.GANGABAI SURESH GAIKWAD
-
4.MR.KRISHNATH AMBADAS BHOSALE
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
09-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Pravin Sheshrao Patil,national Lok AdalatView PDF
Case Summary National Insurance Company Limited v. Smt. Vandana Manoj @ Lahu Gaikwad and Ors. (First Appeal (Stamp) No. 36719 of 2017) The High Court of Bombay's Kolhapur Circuit Bench disposed of the appeal by allowing the appellant insurance company's withdrawal request. The respondent-claimants are entitled to withdraw the entire amount deposited by the insurance company plus accrued interest, while the insurance company is entitled to refund of court fees and statutory deposit as per rules. The record was remitted to the concerned MACT. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Oct-2020
For Circulation CIVIL Side
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Bharati Dangre
-
05-Feb-2020
For Circulation CIVIL Side
Hon'ble Shri Justice R.D. Dhanuka
-
12-Dec-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Dec-2017
Case filed
Case Summary National Insurance Company Limited v. Smt. Vandana Manoj @ Lahu Gaikwad and Ors. (First Appeal (Stamp) No. 36719 of 2017) The High Court of Bombay's Kolhapur Circuit Bench disposed of the appeal by allowing the appellant insurance company's withdrawal request. The respondent-claimants are entitled to withdraw the entire amount deposited by the insurance company plus accrued interest, while the insurance company is entitled to refund of court fees and statutory deposit as per rules. The record was remitted to the concerned MACT. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts