SUBHASH MAHADEV NAIK vs SINDHUDURG ZILLA PARISHAD AND ANR. Advocate - SHRIDHAR PATIL — WP/1140/2018
Case under The Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act,1961. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HCBM070524612017
Filing Number
WP/34125/2017
Filing Date
06-Dec-2017
Registration No
WP/1140/2018
Registration Date
29-Jan-2018
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil Laxman Pansare , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ranjitsinha Raja Bhonsale
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil Laxman Pansare , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ranjitsinha Raja Bhonsale
Bench Type
Division
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 17-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SUBHASH MAHADEV NAIK
Adv. vachaspati kulanand lakheda
Respondent(s)
-
1.SINDHUDURG ZILLA PARISHAD AND ANR. Advocate - SHRIDHAR PATIL
-
2.THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SINDHUDURG ZILLA PARISHAD, GENERAL ADMINISTRATION DEPT.
Adv. SHRIDHAR PATIL
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
05-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil Laxman Pansare,hon'ble Shri Justice Ranjitsinha Raja BhonsaleView PDF
Case WP/1140/2018 Summary: The writ petition filed by Subhash Mahadev Naik against Sindhudurg Zilla Parishad was adjourned on 5th May 2026. The High Court granted time to the respondents' counsel to file a reply within 14 working days, with the warning that failure to do so would result in the petition proceeding without the reply and an adverse inference being drawn against the respondents. The case is listed for further hearing thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-May-2026
For Dismissal
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil Laxman Pansare , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ranjitsinha Raja Bhonsale
-
29-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil Laxman Pansare,hon'ble Shri Justice Ranjitsinha Raja BhonsaleView PDF
-
29-Apr-2026
For Dismissal
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil Laxman Pansare , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ranjitsinha Raja Bhonsale
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil Laxman Pansare,hon'ble Shri Justice Ranjitsinha Raja BhonsaleView PDF
-
15-Apr-2026
For Admission
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Vrushali V. Joshi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ranjitsinha Raja Bhonsale
-
16-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Vrushali V. Joshi,hon'ble Shri Justice Ranjitsinha Raja BhonsaleView PDF
-
16-Mar-2026
For Orders (Await Service)
Hon'ble Shri Justice Nitin B. Suryawanshi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. Kadethankar
-
27-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Nitin B. Suryawanshi,hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. KadethankarView PDF
-
27-Feb-2026
For Orders (Await Service)
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. Kadethankar , Hon'ble Shri Justice R. G. Avachat
-
30-Jan-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. Kadethankar,hon'ble Shri Justice R. G. AvachatView PDF
-
30-Jan-2026
For Orders (Await Service)
Hon'ble Shri Justice Nitin B. Suryawanshi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. Kadethankar
-
16-Jan-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Nitin B. Suryawanshi,hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. KadethankarView PDF
-
16-Jan-2026
Revoked
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. Kadethankar
-
17-Mar-2025
For Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari , Hon'ble Justice Kamal Khata
-
31-Jan-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari,hon'ble Justice Kamal KhataView PDF
-
24-Jan-2023
Due Admission - 1
Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh , Hon'ble Shri Justice Nitin Jamdar
-
12-Oct-2020
For Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja , Hon'ble Shri Justice Nitin Jamdar
-
04-Sep-2019
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep Kashinath Shinde,hon'ble Shri Justice B.P. DharmadhikariView PDF
-
04-Sep-2019
Fresh Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep Kashinath Shinde , Hon'ble Shri Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari
-
21-Aug-2019
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep Kashinath Shinde,hon'ble Shri Justice B.P. DharmadhikariView PDF
-
21-Aug-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Dec-2017
Case filed
Registration No. WP/1140/2018
Case WP/1140/2018 Summary: The writ petition filed by Subhash Mahadev Naik against Sindhudurg Zilla Parishad was adjourned on 5th May 2026. The High Court granted time to the respondents' counsel to file a reply within 14 working days, with the warning that failure to do so would result in the petition proceeding without the reply and an adverse inference being drawn against the respondents. The case is listed for further hearing thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts