SARVODAYA SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD. THROUGH CHAIRMAN vs RAJARAM BAPU PATIL SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD. AND ORS. Advocate - ASHUTOSH M KULKARNI, RESPONDENT NO. 1 & 16 1. — WP/3719/2018
Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 07th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM070437612017
Filing Number
WP/28500/2017
Filing Date
06-Oct-2017
Registration No
WP/3719/2018
Registration Date
23-Mar-2018
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil Laxman Pansare
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil Laxman Pansare
Bench Type
Single
Category
ARBITRATION ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Last updated 17-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SARVODAYA SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD. THROUGH CHAIRMAN
Adv. Pralhad Paranjape
Respondent(s)
-
1.RAJARAM BAPU PATIL SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD. AND ORS. Advocate - ASHUTOSH M KULKARNI, RESPONDENT NO. 1 & 16 1.
-
2.SHRI PANDURANG RAMRAO PATIL1.
-
3.SHRI RAMCHANDRA DHIRENDRAO MAHULI,
-
4.THE ARBITRATOR and THE COMMISSIONER OF SUGAR,
-
5.SHRI RANGRAO YESU PATIL
-
6.SHRI BABURAO DHONDIBA MALI
-
7.SHRI BAJIRAO BHIMRAO GAVADE
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil Laxman PansareView PDF
The High Court of Bombay (Kolhapur Circuit Bench) dismissed Sarvodaya Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd.'s writ petition for non-prosecution. The court found that since the petition was filed in 2018, the petitioner made no effort to get it circulated and appeared disinterested in pursuing the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
21-Dec-2020
Due For Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari
-
18-Jul-2019
Hon'ble Shri Justice S.C. GupteView PDF
-
18-Jul-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Oct-2017
Case filed
Registration No. WP/3719/2018
The High Court of Bombay (Kolhapur Circuit Bench) dismissed Sarvodaya Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd.'s writ petition for non-prosecution. The court found that since the petition was filed in 2018, the petitioner made no effort to get it circulated and appeared disinterested in pursuing the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts