SUMITRA GRAMIN BIGARSHETI SAHAKARI PATISANSTHA MARYADIT, AKLUJ THROUGH SACHIN MOHAN REWANDE vs RAFIQ KASIM TAMBOLI AND ANR. — APPP/1028/2019

Case under Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc) Section 378. Disposed: --Disposed Off on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 29-Sep-2020

CNR: HCBM070329232019

Filing Number

APPP/1028/2019

Filing Date

15-Jul-2019

Registration No

APPP/1028/2019

Registration Date

15-Jul-2019

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Ranjitsinha Raja Bhonsale

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Ranjitsinha Raja Bhonsale

Bench Type

Single

Category

CRIMINAL ( 9 )

Sub-Category

AGAINST ORDER OF ACQUITTAL ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--Disposed Off

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc) Section 378
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUMITRA GRAMIN BIGARSHETI SAHAKARI PATISANSTHA MARYADIT, AKLUJ THROUGH SACHIN MOHAN REWANDE

    Adv. DD AND ABHIJIT ASSOCIATES

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAFIQ KASIM TAMBOLI AND ANR.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ranjitsinha Raja BhonsaleView PDF

    The High Court at Kolhapur transferred Sumitra Gramin Bigarsheti Sahakari Patisanstha's application for leave to appeal an acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act to the concerned District and Sessions Court, following the Supreme Court's decision in M/s. Celestium Financial Vs. Ganasekaran. The Court directed the District Court to treat the matter as an appeal under Section 372 CrPC proviso and exclude time spent on the leave application when calculating limitation periods. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 29-Sep-2020

    For Orders (Condonation Of Delay) [Criminal Side Matters]

    According To Sitting List

  4. 15-Jul-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. APPP/1028/2019

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court at Kolhapur transferred Sumitra Gramin Bigarsheti Sahakari Patisanstha's application for leave to appeal an acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act to the concerned District and Sessions Court, following the Supreme Court's decision in M/s. Celestium Financial Vs. Ganasekaran. The Court directed the District Court to treat the matter as an appeal under Section 372 CrPC proviso and exclude time spent on the leave application when calculating limitation periods. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case