DHONDIRAM SHRAWAN GHOLAP SINCE DECD. THR LRS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH DIRECTOR OF RESETTLEMENT, REVENUE AND FOREST DEPT. AND ORS. — IA/602/2026

Case under Mah. Resettlement of Project Act. Disposed: --Disposed Off on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM070320742023

Filing Number

IA/19017/2023

Filing Date

17-Jul-2023

Registration No

IA/602/2026

Registration Date

04-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil Laxman Pansare , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ranjitsinha Raja Bhonsale

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil Laxman Pansare , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ranjitsinha Raja Bhonsale

Bench Type

Division

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--Disposed Off

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Mah. Resettlement of Project Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DHONDIRAM SHRAWAN GHOLAP SINCE DECD. THR LRS

    Adv. P D DALVI Pradeep D Dalvi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH DIRECTOR OF RESETTLEMENT, REVENUE AND FOREST DEPT. AND ORS.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil Laxman Pansare,hon'ble Shri Justice Ranjitsinha Raja BhonsaleView PDF

  3. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil Laxman Pansare,hon'ble Shri Justice Ranjitsinha Raja BhonsaleView PDF

    Case Summary: IA/602/2026 The High Court of Bombay (Kolhapur Circuit Bench) allowed the petitioners' writ petition, declaring that land acquisition proceedings from 1988 have lapsed under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Act, 2013. Since neither compensation was paid nor possession taken for over three decades after the award, the court found the acquisition proceedings invalid and allowed the petitioners to retain their land. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 17-Jul-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. IA/602/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: IA/602/2026 The High Court of Bombay (Kolhapur Circuit Bench) allowed the petitioners' writ petition, declaring that land acquisition proceedings from 1988 have lapsed under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Act, 2013. Since neither compensation was paid nor possession taken for over three decades after the award, the court found the acquisition proceedings invalid and allowed the petitioners to retain their land. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case