RAVINDRA GANPATI PATIL vs SANTOSH BHAGOJI PATIL AND ORS — WP/10604/2025
Case under Mamlatdars Courts Act 1906. Next hearing: 07th July 2026.
CNR: HCBM070308862025
Filing Number
WP/19588/2025
Filing Date
12-Jun-2025
Registration No
WP/10604/2025
Registration Date
31-Jul-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Shivajirao Deshmukh
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Shivajirao Deshmukh
Bench Type
Single
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )
Sub-Category
Orders passed by Quasi Judicial Authority Other than Labour and Industrial Court ( 105 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 17-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAVINDRA GANPATI PATIL
Adv. Mandar G Bagkar
Respondent(s)
-
1.SANTOSH BHAGOJI PATIL AND ORS
Adv. ,Kuldeep U Nikam 1123
-
2.DAULAT DHONDIRAM PATIL
Adv. Kuldeep U Nikam
-
3.DIGVIJAY PRAKASH PATIL
Adv. Kuldeep U Nikam
-
4.VILAS SHIVAJI PATIL
Adv. Kuldeep U Nikam
-
5.VASANTRAO DHONDIRAM PATIL
Adv. Kuldeep U Nikam
-
6.VINAYAK SHANKAR PATIL
Adv. Kuldeep U Nikam
-
7.NANA VISHNU PATIL
Adv. Kuldeep U Nikam
-
8.TANAJI VISHNU PATIL
Adv. Kuldeep U Nikam
-
9.GANPATI BABU KAMBALE
Adv. Kuldeep U Nikam
-
10.VISHVANATH NAMDEO KAMBALE
-
11.EKNATH ANNAPA KAMBALE
-
12.SANJAY RAMCHANDRA KAMBALE
-
13.ASHOK SADASHIV KALIKATE
Adv. Kuldeep U Nikam
-
14.RAJARAM ARJUNA KAMBALE
-
15.SONABAI MAHIPATI KAMBALE
-
16.SANGRAM TUKARAM PATIL
-
17.TAHSILDAR RADHANAGARI KOLHAPUR
-
18.SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER RADHANAGARI
Case History
-
07-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
07-Jul-2026
For Circulation
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Shivajirao Deshmukh
-
15-Jun-2026
Due Admission - 1
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Shivajirao Deshmukh
-
11-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Vasant KankanwadiView PDF
Summary of WP/10604/2025 Petition Allowed. The High Court quashed and set aside the orders passed by the Mamlatdar and the District Judge regarding a road obstruction application under the Mamlatdar's Courts Act, 1906. The Court found critical procedural violations: the application lacked proper format, plaintiff examination on oath, mandatory Mamlatdar endorsements, and failed to specify the date of obstruction—all mandatory under Sections 7-12 of the Act. The Court rejected respondents' request for liberty to file fresh applications, finding such material defects cannot be cured without prejudicing the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Shivajirao DeshmukhView PDF
-
18-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Shivajirao DeshmukhView PDF
-
18-Apr-2026
For Circulation
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Shivajirao Deshmukh
-
09-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Shivajirao DeshmukhView PDF
-
26-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Shivajirao DeshmukhView PDF
-
26-Mar-2026
For Orders (Due Matters)
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Sathaye
-
26-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. SathayeView PDF
-
09-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. SathayeView PDF
-
07-Jan-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Nitin B. SuryawanshiView PDF
-
07-Jan-2026
For Orders (Await Service)
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar
-
03-Dec-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF
-
03-Dec-2025
For Urgent Order-
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar
-
25-Nov-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF
-
06-Nov-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF
-
08-Oct-2025
Due Order
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar
-
24-Sep-2025
For Orders (Due Matters)
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar
-
22-Sep-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF
-
01-Aug-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. JamadarView PDF
-
01-Aug-2025
Fresh Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale
-
01-Aug-2025
For Orders (Due Matters)
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar
-
16-Jun-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale
-
16-Jun-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Jun-2025
Case filed
Registration No. WP/10604/2025
Summary of WP/10604/2025 Petition Allowed. The High Court quashed and set aside the orders passed by the Mamlatdar and the District Judge regarding a road obstruction application under the Mamlatdar's Courts Act, 1906. The Court found critical procedural violations: the application lacked proper format, plaintiff examination on oath, mandatory Mamlatdar endorsements, and failed to specify the date of obstruction—all mandatory under Sections 7-12 of the Act. The Court rejected respondents' request for liberty to file fresh applications, finding such material defects cannot be cured without prejudicing the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts