THE MAHARASHTRA ADVOCATES CLERKS ASSOCIATION SANGLI THR ITS DIRECTOR vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR THE DEPT OF LAW AND JUDICIARY AND ANR — WP/1550/2024

Case under Advocates Welfare Fund Act (Maharashtra) Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 15th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM070132552023

Filing Number

WP/7860/2023

Filing Date

17-Mar-2023

Registration No

WP/1550/2024

Registration Date

02-Feb-2024

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav , Hon'ble Shri Justice Nandesh Shankarrao Deshpande

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav , Hon'ble Shri Justice Nandesh Shankarrao Deshpande

Bench Type

Division

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

15-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Advocates Welfare Fund Act (Maharashtra) Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE MAHARASHTRA ADVOCATES CLERKS ASSOCIATION SANGLI THR ITS DIRECTOR

    Adv. Prajakt Arjunwadkar,TEJAL R,TEJAL R, ,TEJAL R

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR THE DEPT OF LAW AND JUDICIARY AND ANR

  2. 2.THE BAR COUNCIL OF MAHARASHTRA AND GOA THR. ITS CHAIRMAN/ SECRETARY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav,hon'ble Shri Justice Nandesh Shankarrao DeshpandeView PDF

    The High Court of Bombay (Kolhapur Circuit) disposed of the writ petition filed by Maharashtra Advocates' Clerks Association, Sangli by converting it into a representation to be decided by the State Law and Judiciary Department in accordance with law. The court granted no relief on merits and directed that if required, a hearing be provided to the petitioner's association before final orders are passed, without expressing any opinion on the substantive issues raised. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Jun-2026

    At 2.30 P.M.

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar , Hon'ble Shri Justice Pravin Sheshrao Patil

  4. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar,hon'ble Shri Justice Pravin Sheshrao PatilView PDF

  5. 04-May-2026

    At 2.30 P.M.

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar , Hon'ble Shri Justice Pravin Sheshrao Patil

  6. 20-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar,hon'ble Shri Justice Pravin Sheshrao PatilView PDF

  7. 20-Apr-2026

    At 2.30 P.M.

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar , Hon'ble Shri Justice Pravin Sheshrao Patil

  8. 07-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar,hon'ble Shri Justice Pravin Sheshrao PatilView PDF

  9. 07-Mar-2026

    High On Board -

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar , Hon'ble Shri Justice Pravin Sheshrao Patil

  10. 05-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar,hon'ble Shri Justice Pravin Sheshrao PatilView PDF

  11. 22-Aug-2025

    Due Admission - 1

    Hon'ble Justice Dr. Neela Kedar Gokhale , Hon'ble Justice Revati Mohite Dere

  12. 30-Jul-2025

    Hon'ble Justice Dr. Neela Kedar Gokhale,hon'ble Justice Revati Mohite DereView PDF

  13. 16-Apr-2025

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni , Hon'ble Justice Advait M. Sethna

  14. 09-Apr-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni,hon'ble Justice Advait M. SethnaView PDF

  15. 10-Feb-2025

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni , Hon'ble Justice Advait M. Sethna

  16. 03-Feb-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni,hon'ble Justice Advait M. SethnaView PDF

  17. 03-Feb-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  18. 17-Mar-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/1550/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay (Kolhapur Circuit) disposed of the writ petition filed by Maharashtra Advocates' Clerks Association, Sangli by converting it into a representation to be decided by the State Law and Judiciary Department in accordance with law. The court granted no relief on merits and directed that if required, a hearing be provided to the petitioner's association before final orders are passed, without expressing any opinion on the substantive issues raised. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case