INDAR HEMAN DAS CHUGHANI vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPT. AND ORS. — WP/2107/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226,14.21.19 (1). Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM070056552026

Filing Number

WP/3921/2026

Filing Date

06-May-2026

Registration No

WP/2107/2026

Registration Date

26-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar , Hon'ble Shri Justice Pravin Sheshrao Patil

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar , Hon'ble Shri Justice Pravin Sheshrao Patil

Bench Type

Division

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226,14.21.19 (1)
Mah. Regional Town Planning Act
Bombay Municipal Corporation Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.INDAR HEMAN DAS CHUGHANI

    Adv. ADITYA S RAKTADE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPT. AND ORS.

    Adv. ,GP WRIT CELL,GP WRIT CELL,GP WRIT CELL 1123

  2. 2.THE COMMISSIONER, KOLHAPUR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION

  3. 3.THE DIRECTOR TOWN PLANNING AUTHORITY

  4. 4.THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR TOWN PLANNING AUTHORITY, KOLHAPUR

  5. 5.THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER KOLHAPUR URBAN AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KOLHAPUR.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar,hon'ble Shri Justice Pravin Sheshrao PatilView PDF

    CASE SUMMARY: WP/2107/2026 - INDAR HEMANDAS CHUGANI v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA The High Court of Bombay's Kolhapur bench disposed of multiple consolidated writ petitions challenging demolition notices issued by Kolhapur Municipal Corporation under Sections 52-53 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966. Petitioners contended the notices violated Supreme Court directions on demolition procedures. The Corporation's counsel conceded the notices were deficient and undertook to issue fresh notices complying with Supreme Court guidelines requiring 15-day notice periods, personal hearings, detailed final orders with reasoned analysis, 15-day implementation delay, and videographed demolition proceedings. The court accepted this undertaking and disposed all petitions accordingly, mandating strict compliance with Supreme Court demolition protocols. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    At 3.00 P.M.

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar , Hon'ble Shri Justice Pravin Sheshrao Patil

  4. 06-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/2107/2026

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY: WP/2107/2026 - INDAR HEMANDAS CHUGANI v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA The High Court of Bombay's Kolhapur bench disposed of multiple consolidated writ petitions challenging demolition notices issued by Kolhapur Municipal Corporation under Sections 52-53 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966. Petitioners contended the notices violated Supreme Court directions on demolition procedures. The Corporation's counsel conceded the notices were deficient and undertook to issue fresh notices complying with Supreme Court guidelines requiring 15-day notice periods, personal hearings, detailed final orders with reasoned analysis, 15-day implementation delay, and videographed demolition proceedings. The court accepted this undertaking and disposed all petitions accordingly, mandating strict compliance with Supreme Court demolition protocols. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case