DATTATRAY RAJARAM JADHAV vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. ITS SECRETARY AND ORS — WP/2003/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226 AND 227. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM070054312026

Filing Number

WP/3767/2026

Filing Date

04-May-2026

Registration No

WP/2003/2026

Registration Date

06-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar , Hon'ble Shri Justice Pravin Sheshrao Patil

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar , Hon'ble Shri Justice Pravin Sheshrao Patil

Bench Type

Division

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226 AND 227
The Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act,1961

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DATTATRAY RAJARAM JADHAV

    Adv. Mahesh Vijay Rawool

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. ITS SECRETARY AND ORS

    Adv. ,GP WRIT CELL,GP WRIT CELL,GP WRIT CELL,GP WRIT CELL,GP WRIT CELL,GP WRIT CELL 1123

  2. 2.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. SECRETARY RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPT.

  3. 3.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PUBLIC HEALTH DEPT. RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPT.

  4. 4.THE COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC HEALTH COMMISSIONER AROGYA BHAVAN

  5. 5.AUDITIOR GENERAL OF MAHARASHTRA GOVT. PRATISHTA BHAVAN

  6. 6.SR. ACCOUNTANT, AUDIT AND FINANCE DEPT.

  7. 7.THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, ZILLA PARISHAD SINDHUDURGA

  8. 8.DISTRICT HEALTH OFFICER, Z.P. SINDHUDURGA

  9. 9.THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, ZILLA PARISHAD SANGLI

  10. 10.DISTRICT HEALTH OFFICER, ZILLA PARISHAD SANGLI

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar,hon'ble Shri Justice Pravin Sheshrao PatilView PDF

    Case Summary: WP/2003/2026 - Dattatray Rajaram Jadhav v. State of Maharashtra Outcome: The petition was allowed and disposed of. The court directed the employer to verify Jadhav's eligibility for additional increment benefits under the Government Resolution dated 31st October 1989 and grant the same within 4 months with all consequential benefits. For those whose benefits were previously withdrawn under the 2017 resolution, restoration was ordered, as the 2017 resolution cannot apply retrospectively. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    At 2.30 P.M.

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar , Hon'ble Shri Justice Pravin Sheshrao Patil

  4. 04-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/2003/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/2003/2026 - Dattatray Rajaram Jadhav v. State of Maharashtra Outcome: The petition was allowed and disposed of. The court directed the employer to verify Jadhav's eligibility for additional increment benefits under the Government Resolution dated 31st October 1989 and grant the same within 4 months with all consequential benefits. For those whose benefits were previously withdrawn under the 2017 resolution, restoration was ordered, as the 2017 resolution cannot apply retrospectively. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case