KRUSHNAT SHIVAJI BARAD vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. ITS SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT AND ORS — WP/1952/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226 AND 227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM070051972026

Filing Number

WP/3598/2026

Filing Date

29-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/1952/2026

Registration Date

30-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar , Hon'ble Shri Justice Pravin Sheshrao Patil

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar , Hon'ble Shri Justice Pravin Sheshrao Patil

Bench Type

Division

Category

MAT ( 35 )

Sub-Category

RESERVATION IN SERVICE FOR DISABLE PERSON ( 19 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226 AND 227
Administrative Tribunal Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KRUSHNAT SHIVAJI BARAD

    Adv. Patil S P

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. ITS SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT AND ORS

  2. 2.THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE (RAILWAY)

  3. 3.DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, WESTERN ZONE, (RAILWAY), MUMBAI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar,hon'ble Shri Justice Pravin Sheshrao PatilView PDF

    The High Court dismissed petitioner Krushant Shivaji Barad's writ petition challenging the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal's rejection of interim relief in a Police Constable recruitment dispute. The petitioner claimed an arbitrary answer key change cost him marks in the written exam, but the Court upheld the Tribunal's reasoning that granting interim relief for a single question dispute would inconvenience 100 other recruitment candidates, finding no merit in the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar , Hon'ble Shri Justice Pravin Sheshrao Patil

  4. 29-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/1952/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court dismissed petitioner Krushant Shivaji Barad's writ petition challenging the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal's rejection of interim relief in a Police Constable recruitment dispute. The petitioner claimed an arbitrary answer key change cost him marks in the written exam, but the Court upheld the Tribunal's reasoning that granting interim relief for a single question dispute would inconvenience 100 other recruitment candidates, finding no merit in the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case