AKASH VASU CHAVAN vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — IA/286/2026

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 100. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM070048012026

e-Filing Number

21-04-2026

Filing Number

IA/1472/2026

Filing Date

22-Apr-2026

Registration No

IA/286/2026

Registration Date

30-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Shivajirao Deshmukh

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Shivajirao Deshmukh

Bench Type

Single

Category

CRIMINAL ( 9 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 100

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AKASH VASU CHAVAN

    Adv. Shreyas Purushottam Barsawade

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Shivajirao DeshmukhView PDF

    The High Court of Bombay (Kolhapur) allowed Akash Vasu Chavan's interim application to suspend his one-year sentence for offences under IPC sections 353 and 332. The court found plausible grounds in the applicant's challenge to the trial court's conviction and, considering the short sentence duration and lengthy appeal proceedings, suspended the sentence and enlarged the applicant on bail of Rs.25,000 with a surety, subject to quarterly court appearances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Circulation Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Shivajirao Deshmukh

  4. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Shivajirao DeshmukhView PDF

  5. 04-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 22-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. IA/286/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay (Kolhapur) allowed Akash Vasu Chavan's interim application to suspend his one-year sentence for offences under IPC sections 353 and 332. The court found plausible grounds in the applicant's challenge to the trial court's conviction and, considering the short sentence duration and lengthy appeal proceedings, suspended the sentence and enlarged the applicant on bail of Rs.25,000 with a surety, subject to quarterly court appearances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case